Whats the minimum in terms of scopes that track well enough to keep up with all that dialing?
A VX-3 with a turret works... sometimes, they should be checked. Higher end is better than lower.
R.
Whats the minimum in terms of scopes that track well enough to keep up with all that dialing?
Whats the minimum in terms of scopes that track well enough to keep up with all that dialing?
Dammit I am lookin forward to that fictional beer and wings! lol.
Think we all need to hit the range first though and see how rubber meets road. 8" gongs to 400 yards oughtta do haha
A VX-3 with a turret works... sometimes, they should be checked. Higher end is better than lower.
R.
You’d think so (higher end) but apparently not. If leupold still offered a 6x mark4 or if you could easily get swfa in Canada.
That’s what I don’t get leupold knows how and has in the past build durable scopes that track and hold zero “fixed power mark 4 and the ultras”
You’d think so (higher end) but apparently not. If leupold still offered a 6x mark4 or if you could easily get swfa in Canada.
That’s what I don’t get leupold knows how and has in the past build durable scopes that track and hold zero “fixed power mark 4 and the ultras”
An 8" gong at an unknown distance, between 3-400 yards, "supported", in under 5 seconds...right?
That would make for a very safe gong.
R.
I'm guessing about as safe as if people are dialling for an unknown distance lol
It takes effort to try and understand anything... it takes much less effort to sling spew.
The weeds started with a 5 second window being mentioned, and the fact that the whole point of MPBR is to cover the widest range of distance available, via holdover only, and acknowledges that distance is a variable.
There shouldn't be much discussion that a dialed zero, at a known distance, would be more accurate than a holdover, at a guessed distance, and yet that seems exactly where it's at.
There is a distance at which a guess and a holdover is certainly good enough, and works just fine for most. Get beyond that distance, and the errors compound quickly. That distance is different for everyone.
300 to 400 yards? With a guessed distance and guessed holdover, in a hurry, and offhand? C'mon man...That's a stretch.
There isn't much that is more accurate, or versatile, than a rifle zeroed at 100 yards, with a turret, so that zero can be set to any distance, at anytime. That should make sense to anyone that has shot one?
R.
Once again you’re talking from the bronze star. Trying to relate ‘the more accurate method’ to something where that factor is completely irrelevant and speed trumps the accurate variable. General firearms and factory ammo can deliver on these ranges. The target sniper set ups sub moa don’t start making a difference until we’ll past the distances discussed here so keep chirpin rookie. You say ‘read more’ how bout you go ‘kill more’, you’ll see your extra half minute or minute isn’t worth the squeeze and will enjoy the sight of yet another tag remaining in your pocket. Keep trying to slam those who figured this out long ago because you’ve been reading instead of shooting at critters, it’s working out well for you. How’s them walls and freezer lookin? Empty?
Once again you’re talking from the bronze star. Trying to relate ‘the more accurate method’ to something where that factor is completely irrelevant and speed trumps the accurate variable. General firearms and factory ammo can deliver on these ranges. The target sniper set ups sub moa don’t start making a difference until we’ll past the distances discussed here so keep chirpin rookie. You say ‘read more’ how bout you go ‘kill more’, you’ll see your extra half minute or minute isn’t worth the squeeze and will enjoy the sight of yet another tag remaining in your pocket. Keep trying to slam those who figured this out long ago because you’ve been reading instead of shooting at critters, it’s working out well for you. How’s them walls and freezer lookin? Empty?
This is why I'm more into a BDC type of reticle than dialing. Assuming you shoot those ranges and make sure...
Looking forward to trying the Leupold Tri MOA setup. If it does what its supposed to (subtensions are accurate), good enough for me. No need to touch the knobs.
Takes a minute to develop a trust with a dial set up, return to zero, stints in the safe followed by pre season checks, paying close attention on data collection days(dialling), but you can have both just in case. i have never had issues with leupolds from vxIII upward, or fxII fixed with custom turrets installed etc., those a-holes on rokslide even had me worried about my Trijicon accupoint duplex with all that rtz talk on dialling scopes that weren’t swfa or nightforce etc. so I grabbed a mil-dot version of my scope to play with just in case, but with time and dialling and safe stints and zero checks etc I can confirm the accupoint 3-9’s rtz nuts on, so I can dial with the speed dial turret from Kenton to my hearts content and the kids and I have all done well with it, but now also have the mildot solution too and can reference that and it does offer another 100 yards of playtime on my rig so why not, it’s not intrusive so you can’t go wrong duplex or mil dot duplex and dial or reticle the longer stuff, you could do same with Leupold and lr duplex reticle...it’s a great reticle so get it and cds-zl and if rtz trust is an issue you can reticle instead
Takes a minute to develop a trust with a dial set up, return to zero, stints in the safe followed by pre season checks, paying close attention on data collection days(dialling), but you can have both just in case. i have never had issues with leupolds from vxIII upward, or fxII fixed with custom turrets installed etc., those a-holes on rokslide even had me worried about my Trijicon accupoint duplex with all that rtz talk on dialling scopes that weren’t swfa or nightforce etc. so I grabbed a mil-dot version of my scope to play with just in case, but with time and dialling and safe stints and zero checks etc I can confirm the accupoint 3-9’s rtz nuts on, so I can dial with the speed dial turret from Kenton to my hearts content and the kids and I have all done well with it, but now also have the mildot solution too and can reference that and it does offer another 100 yards of playtime on my rig so why not, it’s not intrusive so you can’t go wrong duplex or mil dot duplex and dial or reticle the longer stuff, you could do same with Leupold and lr duplex reticle...it’s a great reticle so get it and cds-zl and if rtz trust is an issue you can reticle instead
Is it any wonder why blakeyboy was banned from the alberta outdoorsmen forum? This is as good as any of his posts ever get lol..
Everybody else is an a-hole but you, right?
Same? Sure seems that the same could be said of you?
What are you having difficulty with, Dan?
R.
Good to hear! In that case, I could definitely dig a LR Duplex and having the turrets actually function for the best of both worlds lol. I'm a "set it and forget it" kinda guy so I wouldn't know, but yeah...sure read a lot about Leupolds and their tracking problems. Real or imagined.
Always kinda wondered if it wasn't just one of those internet things everyone repeats and makes "true" without firsthand knowledge?