Lots of new cartridges out there. Most catering to fast twist high bc bullet target shooters. Lots of overlap case capacity wise.
But one is like to see is a lengthened 223 type case, further even than the 222 Rem Mag which will push a 50 gr 22 cal bullet to 4000 fps . .22-250 is already available and well twisted to push 50 gr. from 3800 to high 3900 fps.
Or necked up to 6mm would be a nice deer gun. Their last 6mm was a bit of a flop; let's confuse the market even more. The small bolt face world is a wonderful place to be ime. Brass is easily sized, pushed pressure wise, lots of unused mag box, great barrel life. No substitution for case capacity, and easy sizing?.
Since the 204 Ruger nothing really has been changed in this class of cartridges.
Tell me your feelings.
This seems to be the way lately; develop an "new" cartridge, then get someone to build a rifle for it, and sell it to a bunch of people who believe everything that they read while having little real world experience.
Instead, why not have a firearms manufacturer develop rifles to better utilize already good calibers to optimize a lot of the improved bullet technology?
A good example would be the .22-250; put a fast rifling barrel on a rifle to better utilize heavy bullets. It has the potential to be flatter shooting with a lot of punch as a hunting rifle, and with long skinny bullets, lots of long medium to long range target capability.
Their 6.5 creed is already waning in popularity, and renewed interest in classic calibers like the .260 and 6.5 x 55; modern rifles designed for "modern" pressures, with appropriate twist rates are becoming available, and performance equals the "Johnny-come-lately" creed in the case of the older .260 Remington, and is substantially exceeded in the case of rifles built to handle the higher pressure SE designated ammo in modern rifles built to the standard.
I have tried a number of their bullets as well in various rifles, and they rarely perform as well as the old stand-by makers like Sierra and Speer etc.