Lol, well what is the velocity to break out of the atmosphere?
24,933.5 feet per second. Yea that is a real value, on average. No, a rifle will never achieve that.
Lol, well what is the velocity to break out of the atmosphere?
How does this already have 2800 views?
Any moment now, we’ll be discussing if proper high velocity bear rounds are capable of achieving orbit if shot vertically.
It’s only a matter of time.
I think it’s academic. If a stout .45-70 connect with bone, Yogi is going to have a very bad day. It comes down to shot placement with either type of round. I’d feel perfectly safe with a .30-06 shooting 180gn partitions too.
The US forest service published comparisons of bear spray vs firearms effectiveness in stopping bears. Spray had the slight edge, but I thin it was 87% of shooters of all kinds succeeded in stopping a dangerous bear. A really wide array of calibres were represented.
The sample size was over 260 encounters.
I think it’s academic. If a stout .45-70 connect with bone, Yogi is going to have a very bad day. It comes down to shot placement with either type of round. I’d feel perfectly safe with a .30-06 shooting 180gn partitions too.
The US forest service published comparisons of bear spray vs firearms effectiveness in stopping bears. Spray had the slight edge, but I thin it was 87% of shooters of all kinds succeeded in stopping a dangerous bear. A really wide array of calibres were represented.
The sample size was over 260 encounters.
Lol, well what is the velocity to break out of the atmosphere?
You make a good point. If OPs concern is bear defense, a can of spray is a hell of a lot lighter and handier than a rifle or shotgun. Gun folks like guns though, evidence be damned lol...
I agree speed does not hurt. but speed does not do the work; the bullet does.
How big a plough can you pull with a Porsche 911 with 400+ hp compared to Newholland tractor with 150 hp? In this case, it is weight that gets the ground broken up. So it is with big heavy bullets and bone/soft tissue.
Listen to "what she said" size does matter.
Fer the speed freaks. Uuugh.![]()
Effectiveness or non effectiveness of bear spray aside; how much practice does anyone ever really get with the spray? A can or two in their whole life, if that? On the other hand who hasn’t shot hundreds of rounds as the barest of minimums? Many are in uncountable thousands of rounds. Why not go with what you know?
My bear spray story involved a coyote. We were drilling on the Primrose bombing range and there are coyotes that have been following the rigs along for human generations never mind coyote generations. Guys feed them, and they were all over the place. One in particular started nipping people on the heels, usually when they were carrying something. The little bastard bit me just above the boot top one day; I sort of took that personal even though there was no real injury. The next day when I left the command centre at the end of my shift I took one of the many cans of bear spray from the boot rack. Sure enough he showed up again and I got about 1/2 can into him. It was very disappointing, he didn’t do much of anything but move off and paw his eyes a bit. Funny thing was when pawing didn’t work he came back and laid on his back with exposed belly and pecker in that submissive position dogs do. I wasn’t interested in sniffing his nuts so gave him the other half of the can.
The pattern I see for spray recomendations is they are pushed by people who don’t like guns, don’t like people carrying them, don't want guns on job sites, don’t want guns in parks, or COs that think everyone in the bush with a gun is a poacher. The rest are cheering for the bears.
The average person that carries spray has likely never practiced spraying it, especially in a high stress moment.
Red Pepper spray proved over 90% successful on stopping the bear’s “undesirable” activity. 98% of people involved in these incidents were unharmed by the bear.
http://www.bear-hunting.com/2019/8/firearm-vs-bear-spraythey were effective 84% with handguns and 76% with rifles to stop bears from undesirable behavior. The study analyzed 269 bear-human conflicts in Alaska from 1883-2009. The study said, “firearm bearers suffered the same injury rates in close encounters with bears whether they used firearms or not.”
How much practice does one need to be effective with spray? How much easier is it to hit your target with a continuous jet vs a single projectile? How many hands does it take to use spray?
The pattern I see for gun recommendations are people tend to think they're John Wick, when in reality they're closer to Elmer Fudd... Not calling out anyone in particular in this thread, but the majority of us put a LOT more ammo downrange in a given year than the vast majority of hunters who would scoff at the recommendation of carrying bear spray based on the assumption their rifle will always trump spray.
People often misunderstand how spray is effective too. Far too many people think bear spray is going to completely incapacitate a bear and the bear will run away with its tail between its legs. That can happen, but it shouldn't be expected, the expectation should be that the spray will buy you enough time for YOU to get out of there.
I'd wager the same can be said for gun people.
I'm certainly not against using guns for bear defense, its my first choice too, I just think that gun people tend to over-estimate their effectiveness with guns, while vastly under-estimating the potential usefulness of spray. According to Smith et al. from two studies in 2008 and 2012 on spray and guns respectively, spray is more effective at stopping you from being hurt.
http://www.bear-hunting.com/2019/8/firearm-vs-bear-spray