The more the better. Everyone loves the leversI suppose better late than never. This is what, the sixth different manufacturer to offer a "tactical" lever gun?
Is the sliding pin safety really that much of an issue in your opinion? Some argue that a lever gun doesn't need a safety and one can half-#### so they even install safety deletes. On the other hand, one can just leave the safety there and never use it as it doesn't really get in the way either so it's just fine to have it to have the option. Perhaps it isn't as aesthetically pleasing however.The biggest thing about lever guns is the position of the safety button.
Rossi is the best, it has an ambi-lever on top. S&W like the one above with a button can be safety on and off with trigger finger and thumb.
Lots of "sporting and hunting" guns are easy to put off safe, but it needs another hand to put it back on safe.
Is the sliding pin safety really that much of an issue in your opinion? Some argue that a lever gun doesn't need a safety and one can half-#### so they even install safety deletes. On the other hand, one can just leave the safety there and never use it as it doesn't really get in the way either so it's just fine to have it to have the option. Perhaps it isn't as aesthetically pleasing however.
Whilst complete ambidextrous would have clear advantages for all users, the safety position on the 1854 is all very convenient to operate on/off with the thumb in my opinion. On some other firearms, eg a Rem 870, it isn't nearly as ergonomic.
In theory it would be possible to install an rotating lever ambi-safety on these firearms. I'm not aware of any company that makes such a thing as the market is probably pretty limited.I am not a lever gun guy, I am an AR guy. So I look at stuff like how I would run this as a substitute to an AR. My thought is firing a round, re-cocking and reloading right the way and safety on before moving on ( like a 1911). Like, ok, this is a "practical" lever gun wrapped in black plastic and rail. If I am to run it practically I am not going to do half coc king that sort of things. I don't know how the cowboy shooting comp runs, maybe they do things differently?
And for this reason I prefer Mossberg over Rem 870.
In the Cowboy (SASS) rulebook, you can move with an empty chamber or spent round under a down hammer or with the action open, but never with the hammer up over a live round. A real lever gun never had a safety beyond those handling considerations, so modern lawyer safeties are either left on "fire" or permanently defeated.I am not a lever gun guy, I am an AR guy. So I look at stuff like how I would run this as a substitute to an AR. My thought is firing a round, re-cocking and reloading right the way and safety on before moving on ( like a 1911). Like, ok, this is a "practical" lever gun wrapped in black plastic and rail. If I am to run it practically I am not going to do half coc king that sort of things. I don't know how the cowboy shooting comp runs, maybe they do things differently?
I believe the Henry Supreme is a striker system.They should make a striker Lever if they want to make a "practical lever" to beat the ban states , basically a glock in a lever gun.
These tactical levers are targeting the ban states where semi auto are not available.
Internal hammer rather than a striker.I believe the Henry Supreme is a striker system.