what about robinson arms

kevin5182

Member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
hey was thinking about grabbing a Robinson Armament XCR. just dont know much about the quality and such any info would be great. thanks.
 
Hiya Kevin

I bought one a couple of months ago and while I haven't shot it a ton I like it so far. Decently accurate, no jams, fit, finish and ergonomics are good. Every one else who's shot it seemed to really like it as well. The only thing I'm not a huge fan of is the stock but there are adapters to take AR stocks.

The only question mark is whether there will be long term support from RobArms as the rifle was designed for the US military trials and didn't make it. Only time will tell I guess, in the mean time I'm just going to enjoy shooting mine :)
 
It's is not a $2500 rifle. I wouldn't pay over $1000.

Decent rifle that does what it advertises. Personally, there were a lot of details about it I didn't like on the manufacturing process and design area.
 
It's is not a $2500 rifle. I wouldn't pay over $1000.

Decent rifle that does what it advertises. Personally, there were a lot of details about it I didn't like on the manufacturing process and design area.

I think Wolverines last price on them was $2000, but what factory 5.56 semi-auto rifle would you pay $2500 for? Piston operated AR-15's cost just as much as the XCR and I'll bet the Bushmaster ACR (if it's even going to be exportable) will come in around the same price range. The Tavor and Sig's are $3K. You really think the XCR should cost the same as a stamped metal AR-180b?
 
I can't believe what newly designed rifles cost these days either. If we could get the AR's de-restricted, I doubt many people would pony up what manufacturers are charging for these non-restricted black rifle alternatives. I'm OK cleaning out a gas tube if it means saving myself $1000 - $2000, but the extra storage and tranportation requirements for a restricted rifle really suck.

Back on topic though - I'm seriously considering buying an XCR. They're non-restricted, they don't destroy the brass, they're reasonably accurate, they can take the 10 round LAR pistol magazines, and as a bonus they are piston operated.
 
How does the 18.6" HBAR on the Canadian versions affect the balance of the XCR's? The reviews I read mention the 16" versions being a tad front heavy.

Getting stuck with a fixed tubular stock because of U.S. export legislation really sucks too. I wouldn't want the folding stock, but a nice collapsible one would be nice.
 
They are front heavy, I can say that the barrel feels like most of the weight of the rifle. I finaly got my hand on a ACE SOCOM stock it makes a perfect match. Thinking about putting some kind of weight inside the unused buffer-tube, any ideas ?

Too bad about the 18.5"+ stupidity, a slightly lighter (or fluted) 12 incher would be a LOT better for handling caracteristics on the field.
 
Fluting the barrel might be a worthwhile upgrade to restore the balance provided it doesn't adversely affect accuracy.

XCR%203.jpg


Image and information taken from AR15.com. The fluting was done on the entire barrel (not just the exposed part - except of course around the gas block) and reduced the weight of the 16" HBAR to be comparable to that of the 16" light barrel. 34.4 ounces versus 30.9 ounces.

From reading on AR15.com, it appears as though the HBAR is now a 1/9 twist - same as the light barrel. That's another sucky development as far as I'm concerned. Why did RobArms go away from the 1/8 twist barrel? :mad: Maybe the Canadian 18.6" version will still be 1/8?

Toya: I don't know what the diameter of the buffer tube is, but perhaps a steel bar cut to length with a couple wraps of electrical tape for a friction fit? A piece of nylong stocking filled with leadshot?
 
Last edited:
If they compare to 1200$ bolts ? Good question, I haven't tried mine at longer range than 50m on iron sights; yet I don't count any results that day as anything as concrete, I could barely see my target. Once a bit a snow has melted I'll be able to finaly shoot for some accuracy tests and finally try the ACOG at real ranges instead of the 25m bulls**t that I'm stuck to do...

Yup the barrel is 1:9, its stamped on the forward part. Alex Robinson said that he found no advantages to go 1:8 when he tried the 77gr black hills load; I believe thats one reason why they don't offer it as of now. For such long bullet be stabilized in that twist, we'd have to try it. It worked for him, maybe it will for me and others. I've also read that some had good results with hornady 75gr. I think they should still offer the 1:8 anyways, too much variables.
 
Well I did some searching thru the gunsmith forum and read various opinions on the pros/cons of barrel fluting. The consensus seems to be that the weight reduction from fluting can't be felt. It would probably make more sense to just get the entire barrel turned down and leave the flash-hider off. Adding some weight to the stock would certainly be the cheapest route to balancing the gun. Does anybody know what the Canadian version XCR weight?
 
I love my XCR. Ya the long HBAR makes it somewhat front heavy, but you get used to it. It is fantastic for gopher blasting, especially when you grab some 10-round mags!
 
Does anybody know what the Canadian version XCR weight?
Just off the scale, mine is nearly 4.8 Kilos (ACE SOCOM stock with folder adapter, TA11F, tango down grip, Midwest BUIS & Magpul MIAD)

Without most of the stuff & with the fixed stock I think it was like 3.9 Kilos
 
the xcr is great. i use it for gophers all the time. I can easily paste em out to 150m with an eotech. Methinks I need a magnifier though. Don't listen to Armedsask, it is miles ahead of the plastic ar180b
 
I have to say, that fluted XCR barrel does look pretty skookum! Too bad Robinson doesn't sell them off the shelf like that :p

Yeah, if you have to have a long barrel sticking out, it might as well be purdy to look at!

Toya: thanks for weighing your rifle for me!
 
Thats story has been up for a while, must have been some kind of mormon stuff or whatever. Good thing Romney was routed off... Pretty strange for a small company like this to show public support to a particular candidate; I didn't see FNUSA or BerettaUSA cheering anybody (mil contracts?). Anyways, Smith&Wesson, Ruger endorsed gun control measures and yet they are still in buisness so far; we shouldn't bury Robinson too fast, different story than Zumbo.
 
Back
Top Bottom