Books are reviewed before publishing... still have mistakes in them. Google search will turn up mountains of information that is incorrect (or dangerous) because it was written by humans. AI is just another tool, and you should treat it accordingly. If you are just using it to search information, you are missing the point.... that said, it will need a while before it replaces human experience. You should always check your sources... always.
Chat GPT ????
- Thread starter Czy_Horse
- Start date
They already have that from social media, your google search history, your credit card statements, online shopping... oh, and your cell phone... since the Canadian government already used that to track your movements during covid... illegally... without consequence i might add. If anything they are using AI in the backend to analyze and turn it into something useful. In todays world, it will be weaponized Capitalism first.
mactroneng
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- SW Ontario
lololololol, good luck using AI load data!
There's enough reliable online sources out there that I'm not sure why anyone would consider this.
There's enough reliable online sources out there that I'm not sure why anyone would consider this.
Ok, let's see the example - you have a project in mind. You want to analyze every aspect of this project and plan the execution. You are also considering different complications and would like to get the the most comprehensive plan. AI can help with this and possibly give you considerations that were out of your focus. Then you can drill down and confirm technical specs by yourself.
Here is the most basic( basic!!) idea - plan two weeks in Italy ( or Zimbabwe if this is your jam) by yourself and try with Grok or chatgpt and see how long it will take. You just need basic understanding of LLM and prompting .
ChatGPT 4 would give load data which seemed to be biased by forum posts, not published load data. Its answers didn't seem to consider COAL either. I found the results were often that the Starting load provided by ChatGPT 4 was actually close to the book max in most manuals.
Fast forward to last week, and I tried ChatGPT 5.... It wouldn't even provide any numbers.
AI has its uses. If you work a job in a technical field and aren't investigating incorporating it into your workflow, then you are putting yourself at a disadvantage. It's a lot like a firearm, A powerful tool that is bad when it gets into the wrong hands.
Fast forward to last week, and I tried ChatGPT 5.... It wouldn't even provide any numbers.
AI has its uses. If you work a job in a technical field and aren't investigating incorporating it into your workflow, then you are putting yourself at a disadvantage. It's a lot like a firearm, A powerful tool that is bad when it gets into the wrong hands.
I have multiple BSc degrees.
Load data is an all or nothing proposition, when the wrong data could cause the gun to blow up in your face. Have you ever experienced a separated case head? Its not exactly fun.
Reloading is not something that should be simplified for newbies. There are basic rules that should be followed and for bloody good reason. You will be creating a small explosion quite close to your face. You and only YOU should be making the decisions as to what goes into that recipe.
There is nothing foggy or complicated about basic reloading. There exists 100+ years of experience and data in books. There is no need for a computer to be interpreting that data for you in a black box manner.
GOOD, It friggen should not.
agree. My point was that there is no need tinfoil hat when it comes down to AI's. Just another tool.
Hard to believe AI uses double spacing between paragraphs. That's like the slow kid in grade 3.
AI can guide you in the right direction, and more so if you are asking nontechnical questions. Reloading is fairly technical.
Chat GTP can occasionally send you off in the opposite direction you should be going, and apparently can fabricate answers out of thin air with no basis in reality. Weve seen examples of that here on CGN.
Do you use ChatGTP much? It's like a kid's toy compared to what AI is, or will be.
Last edited:
I prefer to think for myself and learn new things and skills.
I predict that the biggest fact checker for any future AI will be an old man or woman with a life of common sense using their own natural gift of real intelligence.
The ONLY way AI will get smarter is if those people contribute to the world book of knowledge
The ONLY way AI will get smarter is if those people contribute to the world book of knowledge
lol you're missing the point. They're going to be getting their data from Plantir and the data centers.
Plantir has been tasked with collecting and consolidating every citizen's data into singular accessible database. This is new and not exclusive to US citizens.
I got the point, the paranoia runs deep and the government is here to help.
Some scary words .
