Hi Bobcat789. Bedding is not required on the .22 rifles converted using the No.4 Rifle body. Yes the early years of No. 9 .22s
converted for the Royal Navy used resurfaced (by machine) walnut stocks and used the Mk I actions heavily suncurite painted with the tie plate to the rear of the fore. Rare are the last few that are only blued but use beech woodwork on later No.4 Mk 2 bodies. All these rifles should have a Mk I rearsight with 25 YD inscribed. As previous post states serial 2799 with yours at 2142 and mine at 2735. The pattern is evident and maybe a best guess is that Mk 2 actions on the last 400. I have attached 2 pics of 2735 showing the body markings and more importantly the fore. It is a Mk 2 fore (and trigger guard) that has been converted from a Mk I with tie plate removed. A piece factory inplanted and drilled for the screw. Also appears a small diameter wood dowel thru the fore for unknown assistance. I also slapped in a quick pic of my Brit No. 7 serial 0129.
All the No 9s were converted on contract by Parker Hale and so marked with dates of 56 - 60. Contractors are not an armoury so they converted what the government sent them.
I am expecting a nasty note from a gent from the west about my using a No. 9 designation. The EM2 was only produced in limited trial numbers. Canada made 10. I do not have the book on them but I do know that the EM2 project was long gone by 1956. I had a box of ammo (long gone now) dated April 1947 from Frankfurt Arsenal. It was not a habit of placing an official designation on trials items so by the time the Navy .22 order was approved they could call it near anything as the FN was in production and named with the new nomenclature system. I will always call this pattern of .22 a No. 9. Too bad for me.
In your shoes I would get on E-Bay and contact some of the stock suppliers in the UK. They may be able to sell you a cross bolt/nut and a trigger guard appropriate and maybe a full set of Mk 2 woodwork with bands. This won't be cheap but Mk 2 spares in Canada are near non existent. I don't think Can. Customs will diapprove. John T.