It is illegal to hunt wild boar in Alberta

Status
Not open for further replies.
dan belisle said:
When every useful idiot started claiming it proved things that it absolutely does not. I'm quite surprised a science guy like you isn't aware of those issues. I suggest you Google them, and have a serious think about that claim. - dan
Click to expand...

You didn't answer my question. When was that? Give me a date. Or at least a ballpark.
 
dan belisle said:
Google it. I'm sure a scientific guy like you can figure it out. You wouldn't believe it combining from me anyway. - dan
Click to expand...

"when does Dan think peer reviewed science lost its validity" isn't getting me very far.

If you're talking about the replication crisis in social sciences, yeah that's a thing. But it doesn't apply to all science. Beyond that I'm not sure what you're talking about so how about you tell me rather than beat around the bush?
 
Suther said:
The peer reviewed stuff that suggests the extirpation of pigs from Norway 1000 years ago was due to habitat loss is going to be flipped on its head by some destruction in Ontario?...


I wouldn't be surprised if the policy changed at some point, clearly the pressure exists even if it's not scientifically backed. But I WILL be absolutely SHOCKED if Ontario manages to control the population with regular hunters while nowhere else seems to be able to.
Click to expand...
The agricultural element in Ontario has very deep pockets, a ton of political clout and votes count.
 
Suther said:
"when does Dan think peer reviewed science lost its validity" isn't getting me very far.

If you're talking about the replication crisis in social sciences, yeah that's a thing. But it doesn't apply to all science. Beyond that I'm not sure what you're talking about so how about you tell me rather than beat around the bush?
Click to expand...
You love those idiotic little digs, don't you? If you're not smart enough to figure it out on your own, I guess you're not as scientific as you claim. Have a good day. - dan
 
dan belisle said:
You love those idiotic little digs, don't you? If you're not smart enough to figure it out on your own, I guess you're not as scientific as you claim. Have a good day. - dan
Click to expand...

Lmao you're right. I'm not scientific enough to figure out when one specific person stopped believing in peer review. Because how could I when that very person refuses to answer the question?

I know the answer. You stopped believing in peer review when it contradicted your world view. When was that? Doesn't really matter, it's based on feelings.


Just remember, those people who tell you academia is bad don't want YOU to go to university, but they're kids are absolutely going.
 
Suther said:
Lmao you're right. I'm not scientific enough to figure out when one specific person stopped believing in peer review. Because how could I when that very person refuses to answer the question?

I know the answer. You stopped believing in peer review when it contradicted your world view. When was that? Doesn't really matter, it's based on feelings.


Just remember, those people who tell you academia is bad don't want YOU to go to university, but they're kids are absolutely going.
Click to expand...
Yup, that's it. And the usual leftist tactic, attack anyone who disagrees with their theories. You can look it up if you wish, but then your "peer review" argument loses its authority. Can't have that. As I said, have a good day. - dan
 
dan belisle said:
Yup, that's it. And the usual leftist tactic, attack anyone who disagrees with their theories. You can look it up if you wish, but then your "peer review" argument loses its authority. Can't have that. As I said, have a good day. - dan
Click to expand...

What can I look up? Be specific. I love learning, but I can't learn anything when you are so vague.

What's the better alternative these days?
 
Last edited:
dan belisle said:
Yup, that's it. And the usual leftist tactic, attack anyone who disagrees with their theories. You can look it up if you wish, but then your "peer review" argument loses its authority. Can't have that. As I said, have a good day. - dan
Click to expand...

While they conduct a peer review, the pigs will do so too. It's resulting in more piglets.

The peer reviewers should pay up for crop damages from their own money while they convene. I think that would make sense...
 
dan belisle said:
You love those idiotic little digs, don't you? If you're not smart enough to figure it out on your own, I guess you're not as scientific as you claim. Have a good day. - dan
Click to expand...
no sense arguing with this know it all karen,Dan,he seems to be pretty proud of his google searches,and all his supposedly accurate information from his so called scientists,LOL..because we all know just how accurate their studies are,,DEPENDING ON WHO PAYS THEM OF COURSE,"we'll just keep shooting every pig we see,,LOL..
 
It's amazing that basically before guns were invented that pigs, bears, wolves were extirpated from Britain and Deer were only found in Deer Parks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom