Why are AR mags still pinned if only bolts and pumps are legal?

I do note that RCMP Labs did make a sneaky rush play to ban all bolt action rifles with removable magazines in the last round of legislative oppression, but not even Canada was going to put up with that and they had to withdraw that clause- for now. But where does that leave the mags?

They did??
 
If youre a khalistani terrorist you can actually carry an illegal handgun and not be charged with anything. There are two sets of laws in this country if you haven't noticed.

You mean if 3 of you get arrested, the one with the handgun gets charged and the other two don't? The idea that someone carried a handgun and didn't get charged is ridiculous.

Its amazing how eager people are to believe misinformation on both sides.
 
You mean if 3 of you get arrested, the one with the handgun gets charged and the other two don't? The idea that someone carried a handgun and didn't get charged is ridiculous.

Its amazing how eager people are to believe misinformation on both sides.
His charges were dropped. Its amazing how eager certain people are to manufacture misinformation to claim some form of moral high ground on an obscure canadian gun forum.
 
Who do you think came up with the idea? Some old lady in Cornwall?



honestly I think the ladies in Poly come up with the ideas and pretty much write Canada's gun legislation lol

So somewhere in those links its says the RCMP attempted to ban ALL magazine fed bolt actions, really?
 
Last edited:
His charges were dropped. Its amazing how eager certain people are to manufacture misinformation to claim some form of moral high ground on an obscure canadian gun forum.

You don't know the difference between "stayed" and "dropped" do you? Sincere question.
 
"Ermm, the man carried a gun illegally and faces zero consequences, but ermmm you do know some minutia thats totally irrelevant to the point right?" Bro literally just go back to reddit. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nd...errorist-inderjeet-singh-gosal-11273164/amp/1

Bro literally don't say charges were dropped when they weren't dropped then get p*ssy when someone tells you that you're wrong.

I mean I'd just say "dang, you're right, they didn't drop the charges" and move on.

We are quite correct on calling out misinformation, like when the Liberals, CBC or whoever spread lies and falsehoods about guns. We should accept that we shouldn't do the same as they do though lol.

if that makes you lash out with stupid insults about Reddit when you're factually incorrect, thats a you problem lol. I consider telling the truth to be a good thing. You do you.
 
Arguing semantics over an established outcome is very diverse of you.

+2 social credit score points.

Defending others for saying and believing things that aren't true because you like the narrative is very partisan of you

-2 IQ points.

Don't act like y'all ain't just as argumentative when its the other side saying something that isn't true hahaha.


I'm out. As you were.
 
Last edited:
Defending others for saying and believing things that aren't true because you like the narrative is very partisan of you

-2 IQ points.

Don't act like y'all ain't just as argumentative when its the other side saying something that isn't true hahaha.


I'm out. As you were.
"The narrative" aka reality is that there are two sets of law in this country, one for criminals and one for actual canadians. A terrorist leader was found carrying an illegal gun in canada, and he has faced zero consequences for doing so and will not face any consequences for doing so, as per literally every recent reporting from all news sources. If this happened to a normal law abiding canadian the result would be very different. Literally any reasonable person understands this extremely simple and demonstrably true point. If youre trying to convince law abiding gun owners that they would be treated just as leniently for say, being caught shooting one of their legally acquired but now prohibited firearms, you have alot of work ahead of you.
 
Defending others for saying and believing things that aren't true because you like the narrative is very partisan of you

-2 IQ points.

Don't act like y'all ain't just as argumentative when its the other side saying something that isn't true hahaha.


I'm out. As you were.
It is you who is painting his own reality.

As has been stated, two differing sets of consequences for breaking firearms laws in Canada right now, depending on your heritage.

That is what we are saying. I'm not sure what point you are trying to make.
 
If youre trying to convince law abiding gun owners that they would be treated just as leniently for say, being caught shooting one of their legally acquired but now prohibited firearms, you have alot of work ahead of you.

How many people have been charged with this? Because I've seen multiple "at my range nobody cares" posts, and zero "they got Jimmy for shooting his AR!" posts, plus there's a lot of people who dont keep up with the ever-changing laws and have no idea their guns have been banned.

Seriously. Do we know of any verifiable cases of someone being charged for being at the range with a OiC prohib? It seems like the kind of thing that would come up around here but I haven't seen any threads about it?
 
How many people have been charged with this? Because I've seen multiple "at my range nobody cares" posts, and zero "they got Jimmy for shooting his AR!" posts, plus there's a lot of people who dont keep up with the ever-changing laws and have no idea their guns have been banned.

Seriously. Do we know of any verifiable cases of someone being charged for being at the range with a OiC prohib? It seems like the kind of thing that would come up around here but I haven't seen any threads about it?
https://globalnews.ca/news/8198819/alberta-rcmp-member-charged-firearms-offences/

You didn't hear of the off duty RCMP constable that brought his AR to the range?
 
Back
Top Bottom