saskgunowner101
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- middle of Sask
No, so I suppose that makes two of us that don't have a technical background in this new cartridge.Do you....
No, so I suppose that makes two of us that don't have a technical background in this new cartridge.Do you....
That’s alot.
all of asudden a faster bullet with higher pressure and higher heat ouput if going to be bettween??
What is the magical math and physics used to achieve in between??
NO MAGIC addition to periodic table that I have seen to cope with higher THERMODVNAMICS .
Someone at Federal heard it called the 6.5 NeedMore too many times and said “hold my beer”…….lolThey should have called em 6.5CreedMORE
I agree,Ron's gain twist barrels are nowhere near extreme as these PXT barrels are.That’s alot.
Ron Smith made me a pxt barrel about 10-15 years ago… but I think he just called it a gain twist.
You cannot change peak pressure without altering the heat energy of the system.Is it a higher heat output? I don't know exactly how amount of powder burned compares to peak pressure, but if you know please explain. All other things being equal a higher peak pressure would lead to higher temps but we're not comparing things where only a single variable has changed.
It may be categorized as a barrel burner, such as the 264 Win. Mag. However, I still like the velocity it produces!6.5 Creedmoor has just turned WEATHERBY!!!!!!!!!
case material or wall thickness doesn't matter for pressure .Increased pressure over CIP level, will that mean we need to re-proof? Will this ammo get CIP approval?
All the years on here I was told it has nothing to do with the case design, material or wall thickness when it came to increasing pressures on a 6.5x55.
edi
It may be categorized as a barrel burner, such as the 264 Win. Mag. However, I still like the velocity it produces!
Stellite is incredibly brittle and nearly impossible to button-rifle or cut-rifle conventionally.I need a stellite or vitalium barrel
FEDERAL marketing....Why the Military Wants It....Extreme Reliability, No Logistic Conversions, Optimized for Suppressors, Shorter, Handier Carbines.I just don’t understand why they would do this to the 6.5 creed. It really does nothing to improve the 6.5 creed, as everyone knows it’s the only cartridge on the market that defies gravity.
I would agree with this but in thermodynamics you are comparing the same material( water) … not all powders burn at the same temperature. Imr7828 is well known to burn at max pressure with a substantial decrees in temperature. So as soon as you change to a faster burning powder you can’t compare to the 4350 the standard load is using.You cannot change peak pressure without altering the heat energy of the system.
Physics fact!
The Federal +Peak cartridge uses the exact same physical volume as a standard 6.5 Creedmoor case. You physically cannot fit 15% more powder into it.
onto Chemical engineering....
To jump from 62,000 psi to 80,000 psi within the same volume, Federal uses a faster burning mix combined with heavier powder compaction.
In thermodynamics, PRESSURE and Temperature are.directly proportional
aka IDEAL GAS LAW ( PV=nRT)
You aren't burning more fuel, you are burning the fuel way faster and tighter. This causes a massive spike in peak temperature and gas velocity, which is why it cooks steel barrels so quickly.
You are robbing barrel life (Peter) to pay for extra velocity (Paul).
TIME does.tell a.lot..I would agree with this but in thermodynamics you are comparing the same material( water) … not all powders burn at the same temperature. Imr7828 is well known to burn at max pressure with a substantial decrees in temperature. So as soon as you change to a faster burning powder you can’t compare to the 4350 the standard load is using.
Federal says barrel life is comparable to standard loads. Time will tell



























