Remington got rid of the bolt lock on their receivers decades ago (long before the sps came into being). More people didn't want it than wanted it. - danSounds like i am not trading lol
Yeah, if I wanted a rifle of any sort, a locking bolt safety would be the last thing I would be looking for .Remington got rid of the bolt lock on their receivers decades ago (long before the sps came into being). More people didn't want it than wanted it. - dan
Then he should just spend the extra money on a better grade 700, maybe earlier with the Walker triggerAn early pattern safety with the locking arm could be installed.
I like it.the bolt lock was a bad idea on a few levels
Why? .... I've had a few and they all worked fine for me.the bolt lock was a bad idea on a few levels
I do as well!.....I like it.
Ditto! One has to learn muzzle control, for those who do not like it...........I far prefer the bolt locking safeties.
Your story is exactly why I like the old bolt lock function.I had a ruger american which does not have a bolt lock safety. I left my truck and loaded up and walked around hunting for about 2 hours, when I got back to my truck the bolt was open and the round ejected. I have idea how long I was walking around like that, with an unloaded rifle. Bolt handle must have hooked something to open
THIS!......All the arguments against the bolt lock, stem from poor muzzle control and not keeping your booger hook off the bang switch!
I like the locked down bolt type of safety.



























