I totally agree with your choice of scope finish.One question: am I the only guy here who thinks this classical and classic gun just cries out for a nice gloss-finish Leupold or B&L or similar scope?
... but where do you find a gloss Leupold these days? All the newer ones, with click adjustments, seem to be matte finish.am I the only guy here who thinks this classical and classic gun just cries out for a nice gloss-finish Leupold or B&L or similar scope?
Same place where you located the 98 you started with; on the used market!... but where do you find a gloss Leupold these days? All the newer ones, with click adjustments, seem to be matte finish.
They're eye wateringly expensive, but the rifle is begging for a Leica Fortis Glossy.... but where do you find a gloss Leupold these days? All the newer ones, with click adjustments, seem to be matte finish.
Except 7rm does "everything" a little better than the 06 with similar recoil. Drawing a line at 165gr bullets in the 06 for "everything up to elk" is also a fallacy. Hardest I've ever seen a moose pile up was from 130gr TTSX from a .270.That's true but there's always something bigger or faster or both. The 300WM will trump the 7mag and the 338WM will trump the 300.
Sometimes enough is enough and the 30-06 is more than enough and is a classic old cartridge perfectly suited to this classic rifle.
A 7x57 would have better but ........![]()
Or up here it’s not, minimum is 30-06(.308cal) 180gn bullets giving 2800ftlbs of energy at the muzzle. Even if 7 rem mag does it better it ain’t slowed up here silly yes but it is what it is!Very Nice work.
But on a side note a 175 grain 7mm Rem Mag can be used for bison and beats a 180gr 30-06 for energy by a far bit.
So true! I have a few 30-06 because they work! I also have a few of other things but nothing smaller than the 06. Never been a fan of the magnums even if now I have 2 sitting in the safe, a 300 win mag and a 458 win mag…That's true but there's always something bigger or faster or both. The 300WM will trump the 7mag and the 338WM will trump the 300.
Sometimes enough is enough and the 30-06 is more than enough and is a classic old cartridge perfectly suited to this classic rifle.
A 7x57 would have better but ........![]()
BC it's good. you must be in the YukonOr up here it’s not, minimum is 30-06(.308cal) 180gn bullets giving 2800ftlbs of energy at the muzzle. Even if 7 rem mag does it better it ain’t slowed up here silly yes but it is what it is!
9 lbs-6 oz. with sling and a full magazine. A bit heavier than I was hoping for, but it's a pretty stout barrel mounted on it- .605" at the muzzle.How much does it weigh?
I have a 7 RM in the safe, and so far have been unimpressed by the speeds I've been able to get out if it. With a 175 gr, velocity is comparable to a 180 gr/30'06. The 160's did a little better, but still, burning a lot of extra powder for little gain.Very Nice work.
But on a side note a 175 grain 7mm Rem Mag can be used for bison and beats a 180gr 30-06 for energy by a far bit.
It's hefty!9 lbs-6 oz. with sling and a full magazine. A bit heavier than I was hoping for, but it's a pretty stout barrel mounted on it- .605" at the muzzle.
Likely nothing to do with which cartridge or bulletHardest I've ever seen a moose pile up was from 130gr TTSX from a .270.
I had a similar experience with a bull elk. 270 with a 130gr TSX. 560 yards. Non CNS hit and he went down in a heap.Likely nothing to do with which cartridge or bullet
Exactly. So what was the question again?Likely nothing to do with which cartridge or bullet
SBP maybeNon CNS hit and he went down in a heap



























