Quote from Johnone ...
" ... Marstar did apply a very strick new QC criteria a few years ago,"
John, if the QC checklists sent out with the new firearms are any indication, you need to check up on the guys who fill in the checklists.
When I got my brand new Norinco M-305 from Marstar last year, it came with an inspection sheet, with all the check marks in the right place. However, the MARSTAR inspection sheet did NOT show:
1.] that the front sight on my brand new rifle was about 7 degrees too far to the left = Over tightened = required barrel reindexing.
2.] did not show that the headspace was .010 thou greater than 7.62 NATO GO .... which is .010" greater than SAMMI specs for .308 Win NO GO on NEW .308 Win rifles.
3.] did not show that the rear sight would not hold windage adjusments.
These deficincies are common to many of the Norc M-14 type rifles [ to be fair, this list and more applies to MOST of the other suppliers, not just Marstar ].
I know that $399 is a fantastic price for a stripped forged M-14 reciever, let alone a complete rifle. And I know from experience that a few dollars in parts and labor can make these $ 399 rifles into superb firearms.
HOWEVER,
in my personal opinion, the guy who put all the check marks on my Norinco inspection report probably never even looked at the firearm.
Are the Norinco M-305 rifles in the new lot going to address these common deficiencies??
If so, I'll gladly send you $399 PLUS shipping if you send me Norinco M305 rifle that is guaranteed to have the barrel indexed correctly, a rear sight that works, and proper 7.62 NATO headspace.
Sincerely,
[;{)
LAZ 1