But this also creates a whole new opportunity.
I can order a $25 2-cavity 41 calibre mold from Lee and use 44 rem mag case sized down. The bullet will go all the way in, like in a Russian 1895 Nagant. That way the bullet is matching the bore and the case is matching the chamber, plus I don't have to crimp.
Does that make sense?
Guess, the guns with such a difference in bore vs chamber were specifically designed for hollow based bullets to ensure sealing the bore...
I hear you! Im trying to Build a Decent 41 Colt DA Navy model 1892
There 41 LC But they have no Chamber throats and use either a heeled bullet .401 dia or a .386 HB slug that seats normally. there Bores are to big at .408 or so.
The guns were good to 15 to 25 Yds max.
BUT i bought a 38 Cal colt cylinder for it.
Im reaming that Cylinder for 41 LC cases BUT im leaveing a Chamber throat in the front and screwing a 38 Barrel into the solid frame.
So im makeing a Wild cat cartridge cause running the 41 LC cases into a 38 LC die about 3/8s will neck size the Cases so 38 Ammo loads and seats good.
This will be simlar to a 38 44 only its a 38 41 thats not on any lists anywhere LOL
Them Colt DA frames are very strong.
Im gona end up with a tack driver out to 45 Yds i figger er Hope
It will be one cool Antique. Them 1892 DA colts are so nice and Light but still strong.
There were a smokeless designed frame.
I can just put the orignal Cylinder and Barrel back in if its a Cluster Fuk.
Anyway its intresting the differnt things you can do knowing certin guns didnt shoot that great back then and why.