Well, the only thing I learned is that there actually ARE people out there that read Omega's posts.
Who????
Well, the only thing I learned is that there actually ARE people out there that read Omega's posts.
On a side note. While I have been tempted to get a .375 Ruger I've heard whisperings of a .416 Ruger. This could very much upset the apple cart when Gatehouses king is dethroned.![]()
Don't think I would even look at a 416 Ruger either...
In order to get any kind of performance say 400gr @ 2300fps you would have to load up to pressures that would be on the high side due to the limited capacity of the case.
Another issue is I feel that the neck maybe to short for positive bullet retention which for me anyway would be very important.
No if you are going to go with a 416 you should be looking at a case that can give 2400fps with a 400gr bullet @ acceptable pressures and then be able to reduce it to 2300fps if that is the veocity that you want.
On a side note. While I have been tempted to get a .375 Ruger I've heard whisperings of a .416 Ruger. This could very much upset the apple cart when Gatehouses king is dethroned.![]()
Well there you have it. I'm sure Ruger will give your opinion all the consideration it deserves.

Congratulations in all the time I have been here I have only put 2 other idiots on my ignore list your now # 3...
What a moron...
Why once word gets back to them of your grand postulation, I'm positive they'll scrap the whole project. Funny that they even started without asking you..... Crazy of them when you think about it.
Don't think I would even look at a 416 Ruger either...
In order to get any kind of performance say 400gr @ 2300fps you would have to load up to pressures that would be on the high side due to the limited capacity of the case.
Another issue is I feel that the neck maybe to short for positive bullet retention which for me anyway would be very important.
No if you are going to go with a 416 you should be looking at a case that can give 2400fps with a 400gr bullet @ acceptable pressures and then be able to reduce it to 2300fps if that is the veocity that you want.
Congratulations in all the time I have been here I have only put 2 other idiots on my ignore list your now # 3...
What a moron...
Yo dawg! Only if you want the .375H&H! Ruger is only putting the H&H cartridge in their M-77 Safari magnum and that is up around of $2000.
A M-700 XCR is a fair option.
Browning? What's that!?
You are right about one thing; Ruger has priced the Hawkeye .375R extremely attractively. Personally, I think it's a helluva buy.
I would buy a good used .375H&H in a CZ-550, ZKK-602, M-70 or maybe a M-700 Classic.
Did it make you feel dirty afterward?I've "touched" a .375 A Bolt....![]()

There's nothing wrong with the 375 Ruger cartridge. However, to think it will dethrown the .375 H&H is hilarious at best. Keep your fingers crossed for the next several years before you know if this cartridge survives the longevity test. My gut feel says it will be as popular as the .307 Winchester. Time will tell.
Well, I have 2 observations after reaing this thread.
1. Noel has a Ruger 375 now and therefore has no use for his 9.3x62, which he will no doubt sell to me for a decent price.
2. You still have to read a tonne of BS to learn one usefull thing on the internet.
Holy cow it really works I have all those little blank spaces there now...![]()

Did it make you feel dirty afterward?
I owned one for a time.
.
by the way, I still have your brass and the 9,3 dies. You are welcome to come over and make medicine any time.The basement may even be done when you stop by next!
![]()




























