"The chart"

dangertree

Business Rep
Rating - 100%
119   0   1
Location
NL/ON/FL/PL
Just saw 'the erroneous chart' posted elsewhere, again. So, I'll offer again that Richs(?) chart is almost completely wrong in the Stag Arms column, and likely more (not that it matters anyway).

Stag bolts ARE MP tested, shot peened, fully milspec. Canadian market Stag Arms rifles are built for and prepped by us, if anyone has a question, we'll answer it.

Thank-you,
DT
 
Last edited:
I had this chat with you a few months ago while I was ordering some of those shot peened, MP'd mil spec bolts and carriers. If the chart is still around we should update the Stag column. Thanks for the great parts and service.

PS The 1/7 uppers rock.! :D
 
actually the "chart" was recently printed inthe latest issue of SWAT magazine so I would contact Rich L. and have him man up and update the chart for you. He is an easy going guy and I am sure an email from you walt would patch things up.

the chart was originally on ar15.com and was put together from member feedback atthe time.... I am sure it is probably still a staple of the forum over there somewhere.
 
I believe the chart first came from m4carbine site, and was reprinted here and ar15.com. I didn't know it was also published in SWAT, but it still doesn't make it right.

Last year I tried nicely to offer some corrections to the Stag Arms column, only to have the ar15 barrels guy jump down my throat telling me I didn't know what I was talking about, and was wrong about the barrels being parked under the fsb (etc) and how he was a Stag Arms dealer and he should know and what the hell do I know. So, I gave up. I didn't talk to Rich, I'll admit, but I have offered him the info, this isn't my job to correct these things.

For the record, I invite anyone who has a Stag Arms barrel to pop their FSB and tell me if it's parked under there or not (cause it is). He was wrong, and ignorant about it to boot. (I do see they corrected that one since though).

The 'possibly out of spec' note on Front Sight Base is also BS. Stag DID have their FSB drill jig go out of spec for a half a days production in late 2006 without catching it, they re-called the small number that made it out before the problem was caught, then built a new type of jig making it impossible to happen again. But, 'the chart' will forever more say there are 'reports they might be out of spec'. They are not, and CMT continues to produce the F marked FSBs for about 3/4 of the other manufacturers on the chart, whose FSBs apparently ARE ok. So :rolleyes:

The 'correctly staked gas key bolt', could at best be called, a differently staked gas key bolt. From Stag Arms, the top stake is normal and acceptable for many industries they produce precision components for, and works 100%. Ned Christiansson of Michiguns, who makes the MOAKS key carrier staker, and knows a thing or two about AR15s, posted online that he likes the top stake that Stag uses, and that it not only firmly stakes the screws, but unlike the side stake, serves as a visual reference should a bolt ever come loose. Ned doesn't have a brand to push though. In response to that statement, the internet dealer who sells another brand posted that he's 'had to' restake "hundreds" of Stag Arms bolts because they were loose due to the "improper staking". He doesn't sell them, but apparently hundreds of customers who purchased from other shops then sent him their bolts when they break? I call BS. As I recall, Ned replied, 'Ill take your word for it'.

I asked the CEO of Stag Arms and he told me they have no reports of any increased failure rate on their gas keys due to staking method they use. They do it this way because it WORKS.

We've sold hundreds of bolt carriers, and how many have come back with loose gas keys? 0 (<-zero). Why do we now do the side stake with the MOAKS (making them DOUBLE staked)? Because of the internet (and doing it because of this gives me red-arse, as you may be able to tell :D).

Believing that 'the chart' is A: accurate or B: contains real issues for civilian shooters, has guys on other forums telling new shooters that they need to get their Stag gas key re-staked because it will of course, fail, and possibly should be done before they even hit the range for the first time. :rolleyes: How do they know this is a problem? They read it on the internet.

Potential problems with loose carrier keys come with brands that don't stake the key at all, or use 'soft' stakes that don't reach into the allen bolt area, this issue does exist, but this is not the case with Stag Arms.

Lot's of AMAZING Factual info available on the internet. But lot's of bad (or irrelevant) info too. Everyone has a stake (!) one way or another, me too, but I do try to only chime in on things I've confirmed from the SOURCE, and try not to state my assumptions as facts. If I'm writing BS, I expect someone to call me on it!, (and I'll do the same).

That way we all might get somewhere with our knowledge, rather than just swimming in circles arguing over dreamed-up issues.

Best Regards,
DT

PS: I might say, this wasn't supposed to be a features chart anyway, it was supposed to show 'milspecs', not 'features'. A 1/7 barrel isn't a feature if you want a 1/9, and vice versa. A 4150 chrome lined barrel isn't a feature if you want a Stainless Match barrel, and so on.
 
Last edited:
Just saw 'the erroneous chart' posted elsewhere, again. So, I'll offer again that RobPs chart is almost completely wrong in the Stag Arms column, and likely more (not that it matters anyway).

If he actually contacted Stag he might have correct answers. He apparently made a chart based on internet chatter and in some cases, dubious claims by manufacturers. (If a manufacturer says they individually proof fire each bolt how did they release bolts that were out of spec and wouldn't close in a chamber...? etc etc). Yes, I am prepared to back this statement up, and yes, I've read his methodology and his fanboy threads.

Stag bolts ARE MP tested, shot peened, fully milspec. Canadian market Stag Arms rifles are built for and prepped by us, if anyone has a question, we'll answer it.

Thank-you,
DT


CAN SOMEBODY POST THE CHART HERE.

THANK YOU.
 
CAN SOMEBODY POST THE CHART HERE.

THANK YOU.

AR-Comparison-Chart.jpg
 
My understanding is that, this chart refers to the "off the shelf" model sold in the US. So any special order features are not included.

So if Armseast requests Stag to HPT everybolt and barrel before MPI, that is an Armseast special order. However, that might not be the case for the standard models shipped to the US distributors. CMT used to sell both MPI and non MPI bolts.

And I believe the "properly staked" gas key feature as defined by the chart is debatable. I took a quick look at the TM, while it is showing two pictorials of staking ( one is a side staking, and the other one looks like a staking done with three punches per screw) , it doesn't really specify how the staking is to be done. The only hard data written in the TM is that the displaced material could not stick out more than 0.025" above the surface, and that the sides of the gas key must be parallel.
 
Last edited:
sorry guys I was wrong, it was not SWAT Magazine that had the "chart" it was guns and ammo "surefire presents" Combat Tactics in the article "mil-spec".

I have both in the bathroom and could not recall which one it was and I just had a "moment" ;) in there and re read the article :D
 
There are errors on that chart... there is also variation in how manufacturers ship their products over time.

Example: I have sitting here right now the only Noveske AR ever actually imported and registered into Canada... actually it's not yet registered because CFC is still creating an FRT screen for Noveske (to our surprise it turned out that there has never been a single Noveske rifle registered in Canada before now :confused:)... so no FRT # exists for any Noveske products.

I have to admit the gun looks great... packaging is superb (which it should be for the kind of money they charge) and most of the info listed in the chart about Noveske would appear to be true, HOWEVER, while Noveske may advertise that they come with M4 Feed Ramps the gun we have sitting here does not. There are feed ramps in the barrel extension and there is a miniscule cut where the ramps of the barrel extension meet the upper receiver... but there is definitely nothing even remotely close to what there should be if the gun wants to claim to come with M4 Feed Ramps.

Don't get me wrong... M4 Feed Ramps on a civilian 16" semi-auto gun are (in my opinion) nice to talk about but not really important. Personally I wouldn't care one way or the other as it won't affect the function of this gun at all. But the point is that the chart claims that they are standard and yet this gun shipped from Noveske without them... either the chart is wrong and/or Noveske doesn't always include them on their guns.

Walter is right when he says there's a huge amount of mis-information and outright false information floating around the Internet. Users need to be very careful about what they read... what they believe... and what they repeat as "fact".

Don't believe everything you read ;) (don't believe me either... check it out for yourself).

On the left is a brand new Noveske N4 Light and on the right is a brand new LMT Upper.

Noveske_M4_Feed_Ramps.jpg


Mark
 
I would just like to add that I just shot a SUB-MOA group with an eotech 511.a.65 with the 12.5" stag arms upper I just bought off of walter.... no ####, 2 shots where touching side by side and the third was a little ways away. with an eotech at 100 yds.

WOW, its like I have a Deer with a fricken laser on its head....
 
There are errors on that chart... there is also variation in how manufacturers ship their products over time.

Example: I have sitting here right now the only Noveske AR ever actually imported and registered into Canada... actually it's not yet registered because CFC is still creating an FRT screen for Noveske (to our surprise it turned out that there has never been a single Noveske rifle registered in Canada before now :confused:)... so no FRT # exists for any Noveske products.

I have to admit the gun looks great... packaging is superb (which it should be for the kind of money they charge) and most of the info listed in the chart about Noveske would appear to be true, HOWEVER, while Noveske may advertise that they come with M4 Feed Ramps the gun we have sitting here does not. There are feed ramps in the barrel extension and there is a miniscule cut where the ramps of the barrel extension meet the upper receiver... but there is definitely nothing even remotely close to what there should be if the gun wants to claim to come with M4 Feed Ramps.

Don't get me wrong... M4 Feed Ramps on a civilian 16" semi-auto gun are (in my opinion) nice to talk about but not really important. Personally I wouldn't care one way or the other as it won't affect the function of this gun at all. But the point is that the chart claims that they are standard and yet this gun shipped from Noveske without them... either the chart is wrong and/or Noveske doesn't always include them on their guns.

Walter is right when he says there's a huge amount of mis-information and outright false information floating around the Internet. Users need to be very careful about what they read... what they believe... and what they repeat as "fact".

Don't believe everything you read ;) (don't believe me either... check it out for yourself).

On the left is a brand new Noveske N4 Light and on the right is a brand new LMT Upper.

Noveske_M4_Feed_Ramps.jpg


Mark

Mark, speaking of LMT, what's the status? Are you going to continue carrying the brand?
 
We carry the brand and will continue to supply LE, etc. with the full product line. As far as civilian sales that will depend on what items US State Department allows us to export for commercial re-sale.

We are working on some possible configurations... we'll just have to wait and see what permits get approved (if any).

If you're a police department we can get you just about everything your heart desires :)

Mark
 
We carry the brand and will continue to supply LE, etc. with the full product line. As far as civilian sales that will depend on what items US State Department allows us to export for commercial re-sale.

We are working on some possible configurations... we'll just have to wait and see what permits get approved (if any).

If you're a police department we can get you just about everything your heart desires :)

Mark

Good to know.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom