Liebril Ban on Military Weapons

As well as talking to your local CPC guy. You should also talk to your local liberal candidate, and explain why they wont be getting your vote, politely.
 
Someone should bring up this point to the media. The Liberals are breaking there promise that the registry was created for public safety and that it would not lead to the confiscation of firearms. I think a law suit could be in place if the registry was used for such a purpose.
 
Last edited:
Undergiver said:
Someone should bring up this point to the media. The Liberals are breaking there promise that the registry was created for public safety and that it would not lead to the confiscation of firearms. I think a law suit could be in place in the registry was used for such a purpose.
Click to expand...

Hmmm, interesting idea.
 
longbranch* said:
Now what have I done with that Garand of mine? Seems to have evaporated!

Geoff
Click to expand...

My favorite was the guy in Ontario who reported that he had misplaced a Bren gun and a MAC 10 (both F/A). I can just hear it - "you know I was sure I'd left the Bren on the coffee table, but when I went to look for it, it wasn't there" He's my hero, whoever he is :D

There is a precedent for the evaporating firearm - look at the number of restricted rifles in BC, some of the ones that were kicking around during the '90s must have evaporated, it's the only way the registries numbers make any sense, and we all know the registry can't be wrong.
 
Last edited:
ollie said:
I'm so glad I own an antique! You can't take away what isn't a firearm! You'll never get my Snider! :D
Click to expand...

Bayonet, and the fact it is a former military weapon...poof! It's gone off to the RCMP smelter.

Also some comity of so called firearms, and hunting experts of Fudds out in Ontario will probably be formed and say it has no sporting purposes...So there yah go.
 
I'm curious as to IF a ban of sorts ever happened, how many phonecalls the CFC would get reporting stolen/missing/lost firearms?!

These socialist liberals have to go! (Or just converted)
 
44fordy said:
I'm curious as to IF a ban of sorts ever happened, how many phonecalls the CFC would get reporting stolen/missing/lost firearms?!

These socialist liberals have to go! (Or just converted)
Click to expand...

Well, right now we are at the ballot box stage...

"Liberty is defended in three stages: The ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box." — Ambrose Bierce
 
Calum said:
Bayonet, and the fact it is a former military weapon...poof! It's gone off to the RCMP smelter.

Also some comity of so called firearms, and hunting experts of Fudds out in Ontario will probably be formed and say it has no sporting purposes...So there yah go.
Click to expand...

Like one of my parent's friend says, "who needs a 50 caliber rifle anyways?" How ignorant is that? I mean, it's .577! Learn your firearms!
 
Whether or not you collect milsurps, fact is all handguns will be on the block next as they too have no sporting purpose if you only consider hunting to be the only legitimate sporting purpose, which apparently they do. And how long that lasts is a matter of debate with all the anti hunting groups out there.
 
Vimy Ridge said:
Let's send it to the CPC! :cool: Anyone have a clip?
Click to expand...

I'm thinking this is the quote you mean:

Liberals Lie - Who Knew!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PtVcwHjO0M


I also found this during the search:

From http://volokh.com/posts/chain_1134020777.shtml
...
On September 22, 1998, Anne McLellan (the Liberal Minister of Justice) said "we're not interested in confiscating their guns, as long as they are legitimate gun owners, as long as they store them appropriately, transport them appropriately and so on ..."

That same day, in a debate in Canada's Parliament, Liberal MP John McKay (Scarborough East) stated,

"Turning now to the motion, the first issue is the confiscation of private property. If the mover thought about that for more than five seconds, he would realize that a proper registration system gives security of ownership and enhances value. Far from confiscating, it does the exact opposite and legitimizes the owning of firearms. Certainly property registration does wonders for land titles and land values as it does for motor vehicles and other forms of property. Why would it not be true with firearms? "

http://www.parl.gc.ca/36/1/parlbus/chambus/house/debates/123_1998-09-22/HAN


On August 26, 2004, Canada's Commissioner of Firearms spoke at the annual meeting of the Canadian Professional Police Association. He declared: "For years, firearm owners have expressed fears regarding the confiscation of firearms. This is a concern I heard loud and clear when we held consultations with firearms organizations last fall. But, in fact, those fears have not materialized."

http://www.cfc-cafc.gc.ca/media/speeches/cppa_aug.26_2004_e.asp


In a 1976, interview in the New Yorker, the late Nelson Shields, who was then the head of the group which is now known as the Brady Campaign, explained registration's purpose:

The first problem is to slow down the number of handguns being produced and sold in this country. The second problem is to get handguns registered. The final problem is to make possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition — except for the military, police, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors — totally illegal.

(Richard Harris, "A Reporter at Large: Handguns," New Yorker, July 26, 1976, p. 58.)
...
Click to expand...


Rex Murphy "The Useless Canadian Gun Registry"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XOmUXycDPs


Soviet Style Gun Control
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEflfh7nPho&feature=related
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom