In Defiance of Separatist Coalition: Black Rifle Picture Thread

Au revoir Monseiur Dion. It's been a unique pleasure campaining against you and your party in the recent federal thrashing that lost you not just the election but your party as well... I think I can work up a convincing tear if I really work at it.

136.jpg


046.jpg


tp9.jpg


IMGP2325.jpg


I think the next one might be along the lines of a .50 BMG... long-range tag is the next best thing to being there...
 
Last edited:
Klunk,
Very nice STG-44. Some day I'll need one for the collection.

I forgot to add the Tactical Solutions .22 upper. I'm currently just swapping it with my Stag 2T lower.

TacAR22-2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Au revoir Monseiur Dion. It's been a unique pleasure campaining against you and your party in the recent federal thrashing that lost you not just the election but your party as well... I think I can work up a convincing tear if I really work at it...

Whoa, stop the press! Who is that super lady?? More pics of her please!
 
Heres my 2 latest purchases, My first AR, and my first revolver. The AR is an Armalite purchased off of a fellow cgner. It was a carry-handle factory upper, I had it changed over to a flat-top. Just waiting on optics!
014.jpg
[/IMG]
 
Well, she sure doesn't do baseboards, but the trade-off is still worth it! I wonder if I'm too old to be adopted?



I see no reason NOT to post this picture again. I particularly like the trigger guard on this rifle.

*I DO - Kev
 
Last edited:
+1

Grow up Corpus...

A G-36...FIREARM...held by "Superboobs: the underwear Queen"...and you're telling ME to grow up? The very idea of showing a cartoon-like female archetype invoking ###ual innuendo to try and exacerbate the desirability of a firearm is an infantile idea in, and of, itself; not that I have any real problem with the practice, mind you. But don't jump on my back because I agreed to give in to it's neigh sequestered Pavlovian response. I didn't throw the party; I just RSVP-ed the invitation; savvy? Have fun with it, like I'm sure it was meant to be had fun with (if they guy thought otherwise he just a fool), or ban this type of photography. It's very underlying subtext is juvenile as hell to begin with. Your blaming the crowd, instead of the guy who yelled "fire" in a crowded theater.
 
Last edited:
I agree, you don't post a pic like that and not expect to get some responses of a ###ual nature. I wonder if she knows that pic of her is even on here ???
 
A G-36...FIREARM...held by "Superboobs: the underwear Queen"...and you're telling ME to grow up? The very idea of showing a cartoon-like female archetype invoking ###ual innuendo to try and exacerbate the desirability of a firearm is an infantile idea in, and of, itself; not that I have any real problem with the practice, mind you.
LOL well said...
 
A G-36...FIREARM...held by "Superboobs: the underwear Queen"...and you're telling ME to grow up? The very idea of showing a cartoon-like female archetype invoking ###ual innuendo to try and exacerbate the desirability of a firearm is an infantile idea in, and of, itself; not that I have any real problem with the practice, mind you. But don't jump on my back because I agreed to give in to it's neigh sequestered Pavlovian response. I didn't throw the party; I just RSVP-ed the invitation; savvy? Have fun with it, like I'm sure it was meant to be had fun with (if they guy thought otherwise he just a fool), or ban this type of photography. It's very underlying subtext is juvenile as hell to begin with. Your blaming the crowd, instead of the guy who yelled "fire" in a crowded theater.

I just think using photoshop to crop and enlarge the crotch area was alittle much....
 
Back
Top Bottom