3) caliber restrictions.. you have to "qualify" (Shoot 20 at a target) before you can move up a caliber..
Oooooooooooookay.......
3) caliber restrictions.. you have to "qualify" (Shoot 20 at a target) before you can move up a caliber..
1) No rapid fire.. only 1 shot every 5 seconds..
2) No FMJ's (outdoor range with large backstops, I can't shoot a 223 FMJ but a 300 RUM is fine.. :S)
3) caliber restrictions.. you have to "qualify" (Shoot 20 at a target) before you can move up a caliber..
4) Shotguns can only be uncased on the the bench (but the transportation rules allow you to transport it uncased.. Duh...)
5) 1500 FPS max on all Ammo (22 Mag is higher the 1500 is banned but a .50 magnum is perfectly fine)
6) you must case all ipsc pistols if walking between outdoor ranges (side by side)no keeping them in the holster.
These are pain stupid rules.
It's not even logical.
About the velocity rule, that too is a practical consideration. Fast bullets damage the backstop. Simple, no?
I saw with my own eyes what a .22 bullet can do to the joints in a backstop.
.
Yeah, the ROs kept muttering something about "it was built in the sixties, it's not up to the task anymore..."
I am curious, what do you Western Canadians have to face when it comes to bringing guests to the range?
The closest club to me (which I have been looking into joining for pure convenience) allows a maximum of 3 guests ever. Once you bring your third guest, you can never bring another one. In addition to that, they wont let you see the rulebook until AFTER you pay your membership fee.
They make it seem like being a member of a club is a requirement to get a handgun in Ontario. Not to hijack, but is this true? If I don't join a club, all I could do is just own it though, not shoot, right?
I don't think I will be joining.
I am curious, what do you Western Canadians have to face when it comes to bringing guests to the range?
The closest club to me (which I have been looking into joining for pure convenience) allows a maximum of 3 guests ever. Once you bring your third guest, you can never bring another one. In addition to that, they wont let you see the rulebook until AFTER you pay your membership fee.
They make it seem like being a member of a club is a requirement to get a handgun in Ontario. Not to hijack, but is this true? If I don't join a club, all I could do is just own it though, not shoot, right?
I don't think I will be joining.
I am curious, what do you Western Canadians have to face when it comes to bringing guests to the range?
The closest club to me (which I have been looking into joining for pure convenience) allows a maximum of 3 guests ever. Once you bring your third guest, you can never bring another one. In addition to that, they wont let you see the rulebook until AFTER you pay your membership fee.
They make it seem like being a member of a club is a requirement to get a handgun in Ontario. Not to hijack, but is this true? If I don't join a club, all I could do is just own it though, not shoot, right?
I don't think I will be joining.
Myself, I am still a member of most hypocritical range in Ontario. They put many restrictions on new shooters and club is not handgun friendly, not mention IPSC. On the other hand, BPD, RCMP, and other organization are allowed to shoot full-auto !!!, move up and down with handguns or M4 sometimes with finger right on the trigger (I have seen it).
To practice, they not only use paper targets with human face and ears but also molded from plastic upper body which they shoot full auto till it falls down.
This club send this to me:
"...The Executive is considering some proposed changes to the acceptance of new members due to the number of concerns brought forward by the membership; mainly that the Club is losing sight of its conservation objectives and becoming a “gun club”..."
Petty, isn't?
I believe the Firearms Act has a clause in there (sure to be used by the liebs asap), that if you don't 'use' your guns, they will be able to come and take them away without having to further explain themselves.![]()
Well.. if you believe this to be true, then you should be able to point to it in the FA and show us.. (I won't be holding my breath).
It's not in there..
You need to understand the difference between was is in the FA, and what "policies" The CFO is trying to impose on shooters to make like as unbearable as possible. The CFO is creating his policies on a whim, and wants to make it hard on you. Eg just look at the ATT and Club police in Ontt. (you need to belong to a club to get a long term ATT. but if I shoot IPSC all year at 12 different clubs, but don't belong to a specific one, then I don't get an LATT and he won't renew my PAL once it's up). that's a NON legal CFO policy.
the CFO is an A$$hat trying to make like as hard a possible on shooters



























