Lakeside Machine LM7

[Satain]

Since it's a rimfire belt feed system that would accommodate the common lower receivers of the AR15 and M16 style of firearms. Also each upper feeds ammunition from our woven fabric belts or our Nylon disintegrating links. So has anyone tried these or are these not available for Canada?
http://lakesideguns.com/title1/upper.html

 

[Dynamite Monkey]

I heard the LM7 was discontinued by Lakeside due to reliability issues. That and the $2k USD price for the upper alone.

 

[Savage]

and shooting a 5 rnd belt that just sucks

 

[Westicle]

and shooting a 5 rnd belt that just sucks

rimfire is exempt from ALL capacity restrictions...

 

[nickorette]

and shooting a 5 rnd belt that just sucks

Rimfire rifle = unlimited rounds in mag/belt

 

[Boltgun]

rimfire is exempt from ALL capacity restrictions...

except handguns

 

[Shack07]

That would be very cool to have. Not for $2k plus but fun.

 

[Savage]

Still at 2K I can buy a few 10/22 some mags a whole lot of ammo

 

[NavyShooter]

I've had discussion with the CFC/RCMP regarding rimfire beltfeds, and they are legal (semi-only) but would be restricted due to being either part of an AR (LM-7) or restricted due to barrel length.

NS

 

[carbonrod]

With you Savage. 2K US is what 7 10/22 with enough for banana mags. Weld them together along with some sort of an acordian trigger. Almost one for each finger.

 

[toomanymachines]

upper

the upper would not be restricted at all. the barrel is interchangable for different length so if you have a long enough barrel, and applied it to a different lower, it should be non restricted.
of course it would probable be esier to purchase the other belt feed they have I think it is the vindicator or something like that.. it has a wood stock and looks kinda like a johnson.
they alos make mini kits for the 1919 and 1917 in 22 semi. they would be restricted due to barrel length.

I've had discussion with the CFC/RCMP regarding rimfire beltfeds, and they are legal (semi-only) but would be restricted due to being either part of an AR (LM-7) or restricted due to barrel length.

NS

 

[kako911]

the upper would not be restricted at all. the barrel is interchangable for different length so if you have a long enough barrel, and applied it to a different lower, it should be non restricted.
of course it would probable be esier to purchase the other belt feed they have I think it is the vindicator or something like that.. it has a wood stock and looks kinda like a johnson.
they alos make mini kits for the 1919 and 1917 in 22 semi. they would be restricted due to barrel length.

Ar variant, always restricted... Even if its single shot...

 

[toomanymachines]

I would think that if it was applied to a completely different lower it would be non restricted as long as that lower(frame) was non restricted

 

[kako911]

I would think that if it was applied to a completely different lower it would be non restricted as long as that lower(frame) was non restricted

Good luck !

 

[Armedsask]

I would think that if it was applied to a completely different lower it would be non restricted as long as that lower(frame) was non restricted

One of the factors the RCMP uses to determine if a lower is an AR15 variant is if the lower will mount and fire an AR15 upper.

Any receiver that can mount any AR15 upper would be restricted.

 

[koldt]

except handguns

Sorry dude, the Westicle was correct. If you can get one of the 10-22 100rd drum rotary mags to fit in a pistol, it's 100% legal. Remember, it is the magazine itself that is the item. It does not matter what it is being used in.

 

[Satain]

Now this look's like FUN!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6N0cEAR1zmc&NR=1