Ok old fart
An aimpoint is better than irons 99 times out of 100, period. Single focal plane aiming is obviously easier. All things being equal easier means more hits, and better hits. Less lost game. There's a reason that the military can't get enough Elcans, ACOGs, Aimpoints, etc. They're just flat out better than irons, especially for CQB which actually has a lot in common with deep woods whitetail hunting in terms of shot presentation.
Hey 40 is the new 30.
I have to agree with you on Aimpoints and I would choose them over Irons.
To summarize my preferences are...
1) Aimpoints and other Red dots (non magnified).
2) Irons with Aperture sites.
Scopes and irons are aiming devices, they have nothing to do wiht the ability to hunt.
A scope is a superior aiming device 99% of the time.
Methinks if you can't hit your target then you are just hiking with a rifle.
Besides which I'm talking about hunting in the brush over here with targets well inside 100 meters, not shooting from one mountain top to another up North.
Last edited:


















































