Type 97 Classification Issues - PART TWO

The owner told me he was moving back to Russia because of his health when I visited shortly before he closed. I got the impression selling guns was not something he enjoyed. all he talked about was how many degrees he had and how many books and papers he had written. Philosophy seemed to be his life, rather than guns.
 
Realistically though the Type 97 is a totally different rifle,with restricted length rifles here already....Vepr and Sagia are a different story,unfortunately...I really wanted a Vepr in .308...
 
so who started the court challenge? mo's office sais that the matter is under litigation,
and there was nothing they could do. the funny thing is that it was not can ammo the launched the suit.
1= why did can ammo not launch their own suit,long before now.
2=do they have a good laywer?
3=how far do you think they will get? or will they get bogged down with the legal system dragging this on for 10 yrs?
4=will anything happen with the oreder or do we wait till the case is finished?
i have to go as this whole debacle has made me quite nauseous.
ok have fun
 
There is currently no litigation with either of the importers. As stated several posts up, if you have questions please call me, I will not be providing details on the open forum.
 
Last edited:
>the funny thing is that it was not can ammo the launched the suit.

That would be very difficult since they would lack standing.
 
so who started the court challenge? mo's office sais that the matter is under litigation,
and there was nothing they could do. the funny thing is that it was not can ammo the launched the suit.
1= why did can ammo not launch their own suit,long before now.
2=do they have a good laywer?
3=how far do you think they will get? or will they get bogged down with the legal system dragging this on for 10 yrs?
4=will anything happen with the oreder or do we wait till the case is finished?
i have to go as this whole debacle has made me quite nauseous.
ok have fun

Who are you, No really who are you?????
 
reading that i would say somone who cant type. but i am old enogh to know that nobody has to answer to me, but was hoping that someone would say that it was an organization rather than an individual.the burden of going it alone.
since there is no way to find out if that statement is true " the matter is before the courts" is a cop out statement?from my servent mps office. if you wish to point to my lack of observation, point out the post like read post ..... dont be rude or crass.
i did not lay blame or get hot , i just asked a question.
why cant i find the letter guys post maybe you know and could be of some help instead of crass.
mr morrison said something intelligent "they would lack standing" is that canam or the mystry man,
does the fact that we pre paid for them make them ours and there for are the ones who have to follow suit?
 
reading that i would say somone who cant type. but i am old enogh to know that nobody has to answer to me, but was hoping that someone would say that it was an organization rather than an individual.the burden of going it alone.
since there is no way to find out if that statement is true " the matter is before the courts" is a cop out statement?from my servent mps office. if you wish to point to my lack of observation, point out the post like read post ..... dont be rude or crass.
i did not lay blame or get hot , i just asked a question.
why cant i find the letter guys post maybe you know and could be of some help instead of crass.
mr morrison said something intelligent "they would lack standing" is that canam or the mystry man,
does the fact that we pre paid for them make them ours and there for are the ones who have to follow suit?


So why are you not posting under your REAL username instead of ripping on CanAm under an alias?:feedTroll:
 
people r hot today !
goozman? is that your out and about own name or just a handle here?
why r you so hot? how am i ripping on can am?
 
maybe i should stick to talking directly to the person i beleive to be credible and intelligent .instead of posting questions in a public form where just any body will answer.
like i said before dont be crass this a public form.
and i am not the only one being judged here. i have read and replied to other post but have had intelligent answers in the past. oh well there is always hope for the future.
seriously , you are that concerned with a comment from a newbie, try doing something worthwhile for all of us.
instead of instigating a fight among users.
still seriously how am i hiding ? we all have screen names. and am sure that someone somewhere dosnt really care anyhow.
haters and badgers make us look bad
 
There is currently no litigation with either of the importers. As stated several posts up, if you have questions please call me, I will not be providing details on the open forum.

Crazy, read above. Most information will not be shared openly probably since this is being worked on right now and you never know who is ready these posts. If you want first hand info then, as stated above, call or maybe PM. Lets all take a breath and stay on topic here, we all want the same thing and that is to purchase this gun and shoot the heck out of it. I will be taking mine out varmit hunting with pleasure.
 
drew thk you
just a blanket response so my mp could blow it off.
sad.
but i guess if i was him i would only want to get in fights i could win, instead of getting his teeth knocked out in a gun control issue. i guess it is a tight riding.
no help there.
 
There are two things you guys need to understand:

1. This is the internet. Everything thing you type here is accessible from Chairman Mao to Ted Nugent. Don't post anything you aren't willing to either eat or stand by later on. Also, don't be offended if some anti or fence sitter comes in here and flames the place up. This is after all the internet.

2. Individuals who have grounds taking the RCMP etc to court is a FANTASTIC THING!!!!! If everyone who had grounds to would stand up individually in court and fight their case when appropriate the antis and agenda seekers in government would move off right quick. It is incredibly easy for a crown lawyer to fight a class action suit or the CSSA because they can direct all their resources at one case. If they must fight miltiple cases they blow their budget on the first few and can't fight anymore. This is where CSSA really lets us down. They take on these unwinnable cases that do nothing but gobble up a ton of $ meanwhile if they would just make the commitment to support individuals with research and information they could increase their efficiency 100 fold. The great thing about living in what remains of our democracy is that individuals can still make a difference and they don't even need a lawyer to do it.
 
Back
Top Bottom