I've never got to watch a bloodtrailing dog in action, do you think that the dog found animals that the human blood hounds wouldn't have, or is it the speed, or that the terriers work for less? I'd like to watch the dogs someday, the human trackers are uncanny.
Actually I'd say the human trackers have the edge on the canine ones when blood is sparse. We only got to really see the dogs in action on one animal but the big advantage I saw was that when they picked up the trail they were gone at 100mph and they bayed the animal up once they caught it. I think it reduced the tracking distance but if blood was scarce, they wouldn't take the trail very eagerly or at all.
Last edited:



















































