Which WW2 SMG would you like to have?

Which WW2 SMG would you like to have.

  • Thompson 45acp

    Votes: 197 49.9%
  • M3/ Grease Gun 45acp

    Votes: 36 9.1%
  • Sten 9mm

    Votes: 61 15.4%
  • Lanchester 9mm

    Votes: 17 4.3%
  • PPSH 7.62x25mm

    Votes: 107 27.1%
  • PPS 7.62x 25mm

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • MP 38/40 9mm

    Votes: 89 22.5%
  • Owen 9mm Australia

    Votes: 11 2.8%
  • MAB 38/42 Italian 9 mm

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • Suomi Finland

    Votes: 27 6.8%

  • Total voters
    395
That Thompson might be a heavy bugger to carry (along with it's ammo), but if I was a grunt in WWII, that's what I'd want to carry. Built tough, simple, and EXTREMELY reliable (as told to me by my now-dead grandfather, who carried one in 1944-45 in France and Holland)
 
Quit #####ing about Thompson being heavy. Just be thankful you are lugging a M1A1 around and not the BAR.
 
Actually, rather than the thompson, my second choice for a SMG would be the PPSH 41. Nothing like having 71 7.62x25 Tok rounds itching to be unleashed at 900 RPM like a swarm of angry hornets out of a nest.

I still would prefer the MP 40 though, because it is a lighter gun and has a folding stock, making it easier to handle in cqb situations, and its slow rate of fire makes it easier to handle. Plus I like how it looks too. I wish I could find a restricted version for less than $1000 though
 
I still would prefer the MP 40 though, because it is a lighter gun and has a folding stock, making it easier to handle in cqb situations, and its slow rate of fire makes it easier to handle. Plus I like how it looks too. I wish I could find a restricted version for less than $1000 though

Try building one for less than $2000.
 
The BD-38 is an available high quality reproduction. But it sure isn't going to be less than $2000.
 
Nothing like having 71 7.62x25 Tok rounds itching to be unleashed at 900 RPM like a swarm of angry hornets out of a nest.

actually....

the drums can often hold 76-78 rounds

they frequently dont work well (drums were matched to guns....hard to find em like that now)

when the DO work....its more around 1200 rds per minute....the things puke steel like a fat baby with H1N1
 
if anyone actually cares....

The Thompson is a heavy-awkward-ungainly-clumsy-over built piece of crap compared to what was available at the time...

....and an absolute GASSS to shoot...

the Greaser is far superior and comes in the same 'extra large' calibre

I care and i completely agree. If you've actually held all of teh above in comparison, teh thompson really is an ergonomic nightmare and wouldn't be my first choice by any means.

Heck even teh americans realized this and phased them out in the middle of ww2.

But hollywood and gangsters and the dreaded .45 win over everything else as usual.
 
I am not awake today lol i should have known that, mind slip. the term greasser threw me off, i am used to the term grease gun lol

I also know it as the tanker, makes one wonder if its the american verson of the sten lol cheap and fast to make.
 
SMG? :p

LMG! :D

schema.jpg


But, in all fairness, that 7.62x25mm cartridge kicks some major @$$.....:eek:
 
Early illustrations. Note the holes in the flash hider.
Also, note the "cartridge in its firing position" with the action cocked and a loaded magazine in place. Real good chance that if the trigger were pulled in this configuration, the tip of the round in the magazine would strike the primer of the round in the chamber......
 
Back
Top Bottom