IPSC Ont Board Elections

euxx said:
You can easily find cries in this forum that people couldn't get their match ammo. So, I have my doubts that someone who can't organize or don't care about his own business is capable of organizing other things, especially voluntary things.

But hey, it is an election, let's hear what others people have to say good about the candidates.
Click to expand...

Why don't you speak of your first hand experiences with Wolf...second and third hand info is of little use (I think it says more about you than it does about him) Wolf is also not a member on this forum...so he can't defend these third party accusations...

But hey...it's the internet. Any ol coward can sling crap right?

I can give you mine...

I managed to show up at the CRAFM Level 3 match last year...without my ammo :redface:

Wolf fixed me up (9 major no less) He also came over to where I was shooting (he was also shooting that time slot but on another squad) to make sure the ammo was working in my gun.

More recently...I purchased a rather expensive piece of reloading equipment from him that I simply couldn't get to work. He took it back no questions asked.

My personal experiences dealing with Wolf Bullets have always been top notch.

I still don;t see what any of this has to do with the election :confused:
 
Quigley..

is there a "job description" for the roles that these people will be playing.. Eg the organizations expectations on what they are required to do to fill the role??
 
The current constitution 1996 describes at a high level the duties of the various positions (including non board positions)

It's a reference only. The President will appoint those positions , and modify the terms of reference as appropriate based on who is available to do the work.

Since those position will not be filled until after the election...and it may result in moving around existing Board Members current duties...there is no laundry list of skills for anyone running for the board (ie. they are running for a Board position...not a specific role on that Board)


ckc123 said:
Quigley..

is there a "job description" for the roles that these people will be playing.. Eg the organizations expectations on what they are required to do to fill the role??
Click to expand...
 
Freedom Ventures said:
The same guy who ran two Level 3s, including a Provincial Championship and National Championship, Multiple Level 2s, and helped on others, donated storage space to IPSC Ontario to keep targets in the area for matches, won 3 National Championships, was a member of the national team twice, makes his living by making bullets and running military comptetions?

Yep, that's the same guy. :D
Click to expand...

Sean, are you saying that it is O.K. for one member to assault another member, and if so do you also believe that these are the qualities we should look for in a Board member and leader.

Maybe you should have him on the Nova Scotia Board. :D Here in Ontario we do not condone that kind of behavior and I’m very surprised by your comments.

I don't know who I will vote, but have serious issues to vote for someone with such a record. Assaulting another person is a serious mather, and all I can say, W.H. is lucky that there were no charges lay against him.
 
I've known Wolf for probably as long as I have been competing in IPSC, which is a very long time. I have never known him to be anything but gracious, professional, and a a very tough competitor. He understands the intricacies of the game of IPSC in a way that most people never will.

As well, I would be careful using terms like "assault," particularly from a third-person perspective. As with all things in life, context is everything.
 
Can't you read, I didn't say that I speak for the whole IPSC ON. As for my involvement I was aware of what took place at the time and afterwards. I also am aware that he was DQ for grabbing another comparator and you as SD of IPSC ON did nothing about this kind of behaviour. Do you condone this kind of behaviour?
 
PeterPan said:
Can't you read, I didn't say that I speak for the whole IPSC ON. As for my involvement I was aware of what took place at the time and afterwards. I also am aware that he was DQ for grabbing another comparator and you as SD of IPSC ON did nothing about this kind of behaviour. Do you condone this kind of behaviour?
Click to expand...

If you are going to tell the story, tell the whole story or leave it in the past where it belongs.
 
Answer a direct question for once...

Did you have any direct knowledge or involvement with any of this...

Yes or no?

I don't care what you heard in the Hotel bar...or what you and your "posse" have assumed did or didn't happen after the fact.

PeterPan said:
Can't you read, I didn't say that I speak for the whole IPSC ON. As for my involvement I was aware of what took place at the time and afterwards. I also am aware that he was DQ for grabbing another comparator and you as SD of IPSC ON did nothing about this kind of behaviour. Do you condone this kind of behaviour?
Click to expand...
 
Quigley said:
Answer a direct question for once...

Did you have any direct knowledge or involvement with any of this...

Yes or no?

I don't care what you heard in the Hotel bar...or what you and your "posse" have assumed did or didn't happen after the fact.
Click to expand...


I am asking you questions as well and you only answer whatever you choose to. So maybe again:
Do you condone this kind of behaviour?
 
John,
I left the communist country for a reason. There was no freedom of speech, no freedom of questioning, so please try to understand me too.
 
Quigley said:
Clearly not...

Now answer my question. Please let the readers know of your direct involvement with any of this...
Click to expand...


Quigley, THANKS for not condoning this behaviour.

As for your question,.
No one here is denying that this took place, so even RD admit it, so why is such a big deal of you knowing my personal involvement.
From what I understand, even You don't deny this.
If anyone deny that this took place, let them speak openly and I will present you people who were directly involved.
Why this is a such a big surprise, we want to elect best people and who ever is running is subject to scrutiny.
 
PeterPan said:
John,
I left the communist country for a reason. There was no freedom of speech, no freedom of questioning, so please try to understand me too.
Click to expand...

Peter, THINK before you type. You can vote your opinion. In general, please think how you want to communicate to others because sometimes it does not come out the way YOU intended.
It's not a personal attack, because I know you are a good guy.:D
 
johnespos said:
Peter, THINK before you type. You can vote your opinion. In general, please think how you want to communicate to others because sometimes it does not come out the way YOU intended.
It's not a personal attack, because I know you are a good guy.:D
Click to expand...

You are right, sometimes because my 'Engrish', I have problems to articulate myself, I apologize for that. I will vote, this election is first time. You know how much I love this sport, that is why I need to know who is who. I hope, no one will think that I attack anyone, no this is not my intention, just am curious, that is all.
 
PeterPan said:
Sean, are you saying that it is O.K. for one member to assault another member, .
Click to expand...

You were not involved and are stating heresay. Since I was involved in all of it; sure, I'll clarify it for you.

No assault occurred. A high ranking member of the local constabulary was present.
I confirmed with him shortly thereafter if any form of charges for assault could be laid and he laughed at it.

Maybe you should have him on the Nova Scotia Board. :D
Click to expand...
I'd take someone who has given so much to the sport and is capable of giving so much more on any board in a second.
You haven't a clue what antagonized the man to the event. I do.
A small slip of temper is acceptable (expecially knowing the other individual involved) compared to all the good the man has done.

Here in Ontario we do not condone that kind of behavior and I’m very surprised by your comments.
Click to expand...
As pointed out, you speak for yourself, not Ontario and you don't even know the actual behaviour discussed.
Unless you get Quigley's job, you have no right to make a statement like that.

W.H. is lucky that there were no charges lay against him
Click to expand...
Bulls**t. :rolleyes: See above.
 
Freedom Ventures said:
You were not involved and are stating heresay. Since I was involved in all of it; sure, I'll clarify it for you.

No assault occurred. A high ranking member of the local constabulary was present.
I confirmed with him shortly thereafter if any form of charges for assault could be laid and he laughed at it.


I'd take someone who has given so much to the sport and is capable of giving so much more on any board in a second.
You haven't a clue what antagonized the man to the event. I do.
A small slip of temper is acceptable (expecially knowing the other individual involved) compared to all the good the man has done.

As pointed out, you speak for yourself, not Ontario and you don't even know the actual behaviour discussed.
Unless you get Quigley's job, you have no right to make a statement like that.

Bulls**t. :rolleyes: See above.
Click to expand...

If there was no assault, then why make the statement “You haven't a clue what antagonized the man to the event. I do.
A small slip of temper is acceptable (expecially knowing the other individual involved) compared to all the good the man has done.”

What then was the event if it was not assault. Grabbing another in anger is called assault, not “a small slip of temper”.

It seems that you are trying to say that your friend did nothing, but is justified in what he did do (so if he did not grab him, what was the event you speak of). There is a Canadian saying, “you can’t suck and blow at the same time” make up your mind.

Once again, I’m shocked at your behavior as RD.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom