I strongly agree with both statements.
Glocks are delicious apples and 1911s are delicious oranges.
I also noticed what you did, but do you know why this happens? Some very prominent special forces units with Delta Force on top of the list don't have any problems with their 1911 side guns. For sure they would have if they fine-tuned them in the privacy of their kitchens, basements and garages prior to going to Panama or Somalia.
Glock is the best and the most reliable pistol out of the box and the 1911 is not. But fitted with quality parts and properly tuned the 1911 is the best semi auto gun ever designed. Those guys from Delta Force could choose anything in existence on the Earth and they chose the 1911 in .45ACP. It is not because of "buy American".
If you buy Colt, Kimber ,Para...... name it for $1500 you will have to pay another 500 bucks to get it 100% reliable whether in combat or in action game. Not very many people want to pay this much for a gun and even less are willing to pay for tune-up. They know everything about the 1911 and of course will do it themselfs. As a rule the results are kind of pitiful. I have a path beaten to my door by those who bought Norincos which don't work. Very often they request or even demand to fix and make their prides reliable while they wait and they have only 5 bucks left after the purchase.
The problem is that very few the 1911 buyers realize it. They like them because they are famous and ###y. But they don't know about the fine print.
Kazimier
Delta does not spend weeks in the field. They (and our JTF2) typically deploy from secure positions on ops that are 3 days or less. A tricked out 1911 that can be kept clean on an in-out job may be ok for SOF but for an infantry guy in the sand and dust for weeks on end the Glock would be a better choice as a back-up to a carbine/rifle.




























Kazimier























