So I've been wanting a decent entry level hunting rifle for a while now and finally went to buy one as a christmas present for myself on friday. I had my heart set on the Savage 111 package in 270 and to my disappointment my local gunshop had none. After exploring some other options (limited by my price range) I settled on the Remington 770 in 270 at what I thought was a pretty good deal. After a busy weekend I looked up some internet reviews of my new addition and to my horror find that I overspent on what is apparently the world's sh!ttiest hunting rifle.
Some people said that it's a decent work gun and shoots straight. I have not fired the gun yet as I have an oppurtunity to exchange the gun for the Savage and wait a week or two, or I could pick up a Steven's right away. I did however cycle about 12 unfired rounds through the action. I had two FTE's almost right away and had difficulty getting the bolt to close properly when chambering a round about 50% of the time. I feel like a jackass now for not buying the Steven's, I just assumed the remington was a better choice.
My questions are...Do I buy the Steven's or wait for the Savage? Or do I take the chance and see how the 770 shoots?
Some people said that it's a decent work gun and shoots straight. I have not fired the gun yet as I have an oppurtunity to exchange the gun for the Savage and wait a week or two, or I could pick up a Steven's right away. I did however cycle about 12 unfired rounds through the action. I had two FTE's almost right away and had difficulty getting the bolt to close properly when chambering a round about 50% of the time. I feel like a jackass now for not buying the Steven's, I just assumed the remington was a better choice.
My questions are...Do I buy the Steven's or wait for the Savage? Or do I take the chance and see how the 770 shoots?