Chinese SKS from Moving Target

How do you know?
Not being ignorant, just trying to learn.

The outer part of the triangle is the "6" if you look closely. The characters for "56 Type" are not on your carbine but are often absent on "export contract" or people's militia arms. It's not beyond question that the PLA would use these carbines as well.

These carbines are all in orignal finish. The serial numbered stock is a good indicator of military issue as this is not done on refurbished/commerical carbines. Note that with the exception of the "D" model which was never issue for the PLA, the Type 56 carbines were built for domestic military /milita isssue or military export contacts.

Many were cheaply refurbished for commerical sale abroad and marked as "norinco" etc after they were surplused but there are still obviously numbers of "new" carbines from storage still being sold off like these ones (our laws do not presently require any maker/export/import markings so there is no need for them). I would not hazard a guess about how many may still be out there. Like most communist nations, China does not dispose of weapons until they are well and truly obsolete. Given that the Type 56 was the primary infantry rifle for 25 years and the PLA had 6 million under arms plus militias and paramilitary groups, not to mention aid to "friendly nations" it would not be out of the question that perhaps 8-10 million carbines were made.

If you check under the rear sight, the gas tube, the piston and the extractor you will see the last 4 or 5 digits of the serial hand engraved as in Russian practice for newly made arms. These are covered over or buffed off when a firearm is refurbished and not re-applied.

The stocks of these carbines also seem to be of better quality then the average refurb although finished with the usual nasty shellac like material.
 
Last edited:
the number int he triangle is 25 and the SN is 16082411

is there anything more you guys can tell me about the history of this rifle?

factory?
military/civilian?

i dont have factory code 25 on the list below so eos is right that its 625 instead, unfortunately there is no sure way of telling when your rifle was made, the only factory that we are able to figure out is factory 26 .

according to the features on your rifle (short barrel lug), it looks like it was made during the mid-production and as far as i know there is no commercial sks made during that period.

http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php?t=411867
 
according to the features on your rifle (short barrel lug), it looks like it was made during the mid-production and as far as i know there is no commercial sks made during that period.
Mine has a short barrel lug, what other features determine commercial vs military?
 
i dont have factory code 25 on the list below so eos is right that its 625 instead, unfortunately there is no sure way of telling when your rifle was made, the only factory that we are able to figure out is factory 26 .

according to the features on your rifle (short barrel lug), it looks like it was made during the mid-production and as far as i know there is no commercial sks made during that period.

http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php?t=411867



Okay here is another pic of it



8.jpg
 
You are really good with that camera...
Switch to macro mode if you're shooting upclose, turn off the flast and try using another light source.
 
i dont have factory code 25 on the list below so eos is right that its 625 instead, unfortunately there is no sure way of telling when your rifle was made, the only factory that we are able to figure out is factory 26 .

according to the features on your rifle (short barrel lug), it looks like it was made during the mid-production and as far as i know there is no commercial sks made during that period.

http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php?t=411867

What is interesting is the factory 306 transition from short lug to pinned barrel between the 1.5 and 1.6 million series seen in this current batch.
 
same as my early Chinese, now i wonder why the Russian didn't do it the same way .

Very much like the T56 that Lever sold a while ago.

My guess about the Russians? The 10 round magazines were not considered by the importers and when finally made aware of it they needed a quick and dirty solution for all the thousands of other carbines contracted. The method chosen was probably easiest with the tools at hand for whoever did it. Hopefully, they can devise something less damaging for future imports.
 
Sorry you are wrong. It is approved like that for export at origin. Hopefully I can change it by summer. I will try my best.

Very much like the T56 that Lever sold a while ago.

My guess about the Russians? The 10 round magazines were not considered by the importers and when finally made aware of it they needed a quick and dirty solution for all the thousands of other carbines contracted. The method chosen was probably easiest with the tools at hand for whoever did it. Hopefully, they can devise something less damaging for future imports.
 
It's obvious that the work was done at the point of origin. Why was that method chosen?

I it permanent and you cannot removed easily. They have laws too you know. If it comes from former USSR they all do it that way. The rules have not changed for awhile.
Now it is less complicated too. Take a mag out drill it, weld it, done. It might take some financial incentive :) .
 
Back
Top Bottom