- Location
- Manitoba, Canada
Your factory is 625. Not a commercial production carbine.
so shes a keeper, dont shooter, worth some money later sks lol ?
Your factory is 625. Not a commercial production carbine.
I have to admit...
I love how they don't destroy the mags when pinning them.
How do you know?
Not being ignorant, just trying to learn.
the number int he triangle is 25 and the SN is 16082411
is there anything more you guys can tell me about the history of this rifle?
factory?
military/civilian?
Mine has a short barrel lug, what other features determine commercial vs military?according to the features on your rifle (short barrel lug), it looks like it was made during the mid-production and as far as i know there is no commercial sks made during that period.
i dont have factory code 25 on the list below so eos is right that its 625 instead, unfortunately there is no sure way of telling when your rifle was made, the only factory that we are able to figure out is factory 26 .
according to the features on your rifle (short barrel lug), it looks like it was made during the mid-production and as far as i know there is no commercial sks made during that period.
http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php?t=411867
i dont have factory code 25 on the list below so eos is right that its 625 instead, unfortunately there is no sure way of telling when your rifle was made, the only factory that we are able to figure out is factory 26 .
according to the features on your rifle (short barrel lug), it looks like it was made during the mid-production and as far as i know there is no commercial sks made during that period.
http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php?t=411867
also how are the mag blocked?
The current batch has both threaded and pinned bbls?
same as my early Chinese, now i wonder why the Russian didn't do it the same way .
Very much like the T56 that Lever sold a while ago.
My guess about the Russians? The 10 round magazines were not considered by the importers and when finally made aware of it they needed a quick and dirty solution for all the thousands of other carbines contracted. The method chosen was probably easiest with the tools at hand for whoever did it. Hopefully, they can devise something less damaging for future imports.
Sorry you are wrong. It is approved like that for export at origin. Hopefully I can change it by summer. I will try my best.
It's obvious that the work was done at the point of origin. Why was that method chosen?



























