Hornady Superformance™ Rifle Ammunition field reports?

Good article in one of the rifle magazines lately about this ammo.

The author went to Hornady, and ultimately used their testing facilities to do comparisons.

Gains of 100 to 200 fps, all else being equal.

It's all about the powder, which is proprietary. Each caliber and bullet size requires specific blending.

Because of the broad pressure curve, lower pressures overall, with greatly improved efficiency in burn rates. No unburnt powder leaving the end of the barrel, which is why they can achieve maximum performance from shorter barrels.

First developed for LeverEvolution, then Ruger short magnums.

No gimmicks, it works as advertised.

Bud

The whole concept is a Gimmick, how much more speed does any cartridge require? The answer none. FS
 
Good article in one of the rifle magazines lately about this ammo.

The author went to Hornady, and ultimately used their testing facilities to do comparisons.

Gains of 100 to 200 fps, all else being equal.

It's all about the powder, which is proprietary. Each caliber and bullet size requires specific blending.

Because of the broad pressure curve, lower pressures overall, with greatly improved efficiency in burn rates. No unburnt powder leaving the end of the barrel, which is why they can achieve maximum performance from shorter barrels.

First developed for LeverEvolution, then Ruger short magnums.

No gimmicks, it works as advertised.

If you follow up on post #15 it is obvious there are some contentious opinions based on real life observations that seem to refute hornadys claims about the super cartridges.
The old truism 'If it looks too good to be true, it probably is' still seems to apply in most real world situations.
 
Of course people who buy factory ammo dont' have to worry about being able to use the brass a second , third , fourth time etc. Im sure pressure has to be up there.....that being said I would buy some and test it over the chrony . Measure case head expansion etc etc.
 
Time and technology march on. It is a Reloder 17 style powder which really does give velocity bumps. See:

w ww.6mmbr.com/reloder17.html
"In the case of Alliant's new Reloder 17 (RL17), we were truly amazed by the enhanced velocities this powder offers compared to other propellants."

"but that still means that RL17 can boost your max velocity by over 200 fps.
That's a huge increase, a monumental gain in velocity. We've never seen anything like this--where one powder offers such a dramatic increase in max velocity over other "preferred" powders used by precision shooters."

Unfortunately Reloder 17 is a fairly slow burning powder, but it's only a matter of time until they have a .223 speed variant (my particular interest). May put a stake in the heart of the "is a .223 enough for deer/bear" threads. OK maybe not :)
 
I've only tried RL17 in my 375 RUger, and I did indeed get higher velocity than any other powder I've tried. Accuracy was not as good as H4350, and I had no real RL-17 data to ensure my loads were safe so I discontinued for now (no pressure signs but that doesn't mean anything)

Next I will try in my 300WSM, but accuracy is more important than velocity, so it remains to be seen if I will use RL17 much.
 
Wouldn't work the burn rate is to fast as I said before it is equal to IMR4350.

Retumbo is the powder you should be using in a 300RUM here is my favorite load = 200gr Accubond + 94grs Retumbo = 3200fps...
 
Have any of you guys ever experimented with blending different powders in your reloading (eg. mixing one part IMR 4350 and two parts H-4831)?
 
Have any of you guys ever experimented with blending different powders in your reloading (eg. mixing one part IMR 4350 and two parts H-4831)?

Don't mess with that!

mushroom-cloud.jpg
 
Have any of you guys ever experimented with blending different powders in your reloading (eg. mixing one part IMR 4350 and two parts H-4831)?

Not only is that very dangerous- since a person has no way of knowing what they will end up with- but it is also totally unnecessary. We have powders that will do just about anything that can be done, no need to mix things up
 
Ooooh, secret voodoo powders...:runaway:

This is a pretty bold statement from Hornady:



I would like to see their research data on how they are increasing velocity that much, without ANY increase in pressures.

Not sure I want to drive an SST any faster than I'm already loading...


so you think that the technology behind internal ballistics has peaked?
 
Agreed with Gatehouse and the others; it's MARKETING.

Have a look at Alliant website and you'll find the RL17 is not that magic; If it was "magic", then, don't worry, they would have produce top-speed velocities; but, in fact espcially in smaller cases, like the '06, it ain't do much better than any other of the H4350/IMR4350/W760/H414 burning rate of powders... but it may be a bit "better" with the chubby cases... but, still 100 fps is no big advantage...

Also, if the pressures were so low and the powder would produce so super velocities, why do they don't show up on Alliant publications? Because it's not as magic as it may look - I don't say it's not a good product, I just say it's ain't revolution yet.

Then, I'd be really curious to see strain gauge readings on those marvelous loads... I think it would show a big part of the truth.
 
We will be lucky to see this ammo in Canada this year, Hornady has been barely delivering their bread and butter ammo let alone any new product.
 
Agreed with Gatehouse and the others; it's MARKETING.

Have a look at Alliant website and you'll find the RL17 is not that magic; If it was "magic", then, don't worry, they would have produce top-speed velocities; but, in fact espcially in smaller cases, like the '06, it ain't do much better than any other of the H4350/IMR4350/W760/H414 burning rate of powders... but it may be a bit "better" with the chubby cases... but, still 100 fps is no big advantage...

Also, if the pressures were so low and the powder would produce so super velocities, why do they don't show up on Alliant publications? Because it's not as magic as it may look - I don't say it's not a good product, I just say it's ain't revolution yet.

Then, I'd be really curious to see strain gauge readings on those marvelous loads... I think it would show a big part of the truth.

you really should read the following article:
w ww.6mmbr.com/reloder17.html

"German Salazar, using Bob Jensen's Oehler 43 equipped for pressure-testing, confirmed that the pressure curve for Reloder 17 is much "gentler" than that of other powders in the same burn range. After RL17 hits peak pressure, the energy level doesn't drop as rapidly as with other powders. So there is more energy pushing your bullet for a longer time. Since pressure drops off more slowly, you can achieve more velocity for a given peak pressure."

.308 with 185gr Lapua match bullet:
RL17 once again showed a real advantage. At a maximum load of 47.0 grains of RL17, we saw 2701 fps at 54,400 psi. This was a fairly full charge with a bit of powder compression so we didn’t go further although the pressure was still well below max.

Time pressure graph for Hornady "Superfomance". Note the area under the curve (higher total energy transferred) and the peak pressure (no increase):

w ww.hornady.com/assets/templates/site/images/superformance_bgchart.JPG

superformance_bgchart.JPG
 
Last edited:
You should really read the "5th Prpellant Profiles".... I don't see there any "extraordinary performances".. and why does Alliant did not publish those magical datas?? I'm sure that if it was so wonderful, they'd take a big chance on advertizing it A LOT;

Instead, here's what they choose to publish (from Alliant website);

308 Winchester /Speer 150 gr BTSP /Case Federal / OAL min 2.8" /Barrel 24"/ Primer Fed 210/ Reloader 17 /50 gr / 2,763 fps

308 Winchester / Speer 165 gr BTSP/ Case Federal / OAL min 2.8" / Barrel 24"/ Primer Fed 210 / Reloader 17/ 50gr / 2,739 fps

308 Winchester / Speer 180 gr BTSP/ Case Federal / OAL min 2.8" / Barrel 22"/ Primer Fed 210 / Reloader 17 / 48.7gr / 2,641 fps

Quite average, isn't it???

So tell me why the H**l a manufacturer would not provide those super duper datas(??? - if they are realistic, of course) instead of bringing the performance to a "normal" level?????? They aren't stupid, ya know.

BTW, a MAP of 54 400 PSI is the "commercial loading" pressure used for the magnum calibers (64 000 PSI). Commercial (SAFE as per SAAMI) loading for the .308 Win usually don't run over 52 000 PSI (the top of the yellow zone, in Quickload).
 
Back
Top Bottom