I agree with BROCOLT. “There is nothing wrong with getting trigger time on a rimfire”.
I think .22 matches are a great way to introduce people to the shooting sports. It is low recoil, low cost, and little noise. I also believe they are a great training tool for IPSC, USPSA and PPC for the before mentioned reasons. I have a .22 kit for my Edge and that is predominately what I shoot. Using the .22 top end on my Edge I am developing the same neural pathways, coordination, muscle memory, transitioning and target acquisition skills as I would be using a .40. The only real difference is your lack of practice with recoil control. Personally I find shooting the .22 pistols very similar to shooting an open gun (except for the muzzle blast of course) and would have no problems if people were to shoot level I matches with their .22 pistols (or rifles) on my squad. I makes no difference to me what other people choose to shoot. If it gets more people out on the ranges and pulling triggers I am all for it! We need more people in the shooting sports. Look around at your next range event and see how many shooters are under 35 - 40 years of age; I’d bet a lot more are over 40 than under. We have lost a generation of shooters to liberalized/prejudicial views and we better work hard to get them back or we are all going to suffer from a general population who fear guns and believe firearms should only be processed by those in uniform. I once met an aboriginal leader and when I brought up the discussion of prejudice his words to me were, “If you dislike me, my views or my skin color come and spend a week at my house.” I thought that statement was quite profound and I strongly agree with his chosen methodology. If more people were on the range pulling triggers we, the gun owning population of Canada, would have more support so that when registry votes in the House come up they will be defeated. We should be encouraging all shooting, not eliminating people from the sport because We should be encouraging all shooting, not eliminating people from the sport because hegemonic masculinity precludes the use of mouse guns!
It has been my experience that when people get interested in shooting starting out with the .22’s they get hooked on the shooting sports; it’s cheap! (that’s how I got the shooting bug) When people start out on centerfire they think a lot about the price. It is hard to justify the cost initially. (After a year or two shooting it seems like it is hard to stop the spending on the shooting sports!)
Mike Burrell (for those who don’t recognize the name he is the Canadian IPSC Standard Champion and has been for a long time) once told me he had a .22 Ruger Rifle that he shot a couple hundred rounds out of every weekend when he was a kid at his cabin and that what got him into IPSC. He grew to like shooting as fast and accurately as he could. Just imagine if he had to started out with a 9mm or a .40. Could he have afforded it? Would it have pushed him out of shooting? To those reading this post; What did you start shooting with? .22? Probably!