I have read through the legal "rules" but it is still unclear to me (probably the way it was intended).
My question is if I have a Remington 870 and purchase/install a new factory manufactured barrel of 12.5" from a respected dealer/manufacturer and also replace the original Remington 870 stock with a pistol grip the overall length of the firearm would become less then 26" (Approx 22").
Would my firearm still be non-restricted?
or
Would my firearm now become prohibited as the overall length is < 26"?

Source: http://www.nfa.ca/node/128
My question is if I have a Remington 870 and purchase/install a new factory manufactured barrel of 12.5" from a respected dealer/manufacturer and also replace the original Remington 870 stock with a pistol grip the overall length of the firearm would become less then 26" (Approx 22").
Would my firearm still be non-restricted?
or
Would my firearm now become prohibited as the overall length is < 26"?
OVERALL LENGTH LESS THAN 26"/660mm RULES:
CC s. 84(1) "prohibited firearm" (b): This is another clause of the same law -- the one cited immediately above -- and it applies in the same way. If the firearm ARRIVES at the "less than 26"/660mm in overall length" condition by "sawing, cutting" etc., then it is forced into the "prohibited firearm" class. If it left the factory at that too-short length, the limit does NOT apply. It is non-restricted, UNLESS it is semi-automatic AND centrefire.
Example: A Remington Model 870 pump-action shotgun that has been fitted with a Scattergun Technologies 12"/305mm barrel and a Pachmayr pistol grip is less than 26"/660mm in overall length, but is NOT "prohibited." It is a "prohibited firearm" if this was done to a Remington 870 that left the factory with those parts, but it is non-restricted if it was re-manufactured and left the Scattergun Technologies factory with them. It doesn't HAVE to make sense -- it's GOVERNMENT POLICY.
Note that WHICH class the short firearm becomes -- non-restricted, "restricted" OR "prohibited" -- depends upon HOW it ARRIVED at that shortened length. That strongly reinforces what I have said above about the length determination --
Source: http://www.nfa.ca/node/128






















































