In Quebec my ATT actually names my club. I need a second ATT to go to another club, gun smith, buy a new gun, etc.
Yes you guys have it even worse than we do.....
In Quebec my ATT actually names my club. I need a second ATT to go to another club, gun smith, buy a new gun, etc.
Can you provide any documentation supporting this (Firearms Act, Criminal Code)?
Can you provide any documentation supporting this (Firearms Act, Criminal Code)?
My interpretation is that a restricted firearm can be discharged where it can be possessed. A restricted can be possessed at a range, and at your home. To get a restricted to your range, you need an ATT, but an ATT has nothing to do with possession in your own dwelling.
Unless you are located in an area that has a no shooting bylaw, you can shoot in your own house. As an extension, as long as it is safe, you can shoot from your house (indoors) to the outdoors.
Remember, unless it is specifically proscribed as illegal, it is legal.
Wow,
looks like this ATT business needs to be fought. It's absolutely ridiculous and no politician, even the top snake oil salesman politicians would be unable to justify the ATT system. It's just absurd and attempts to complicate things and make it even more difficult to shoot firearms and politically incorrect-looking long guns.
Legally, methinks you are absolutely correct Frankie !
If using a firearm SAFELY ,
I have found no law otherwise.
![]()
You will find the law quite specific in C 68. You just haven't looked hard enough. HInt: Try the section relating to Authorizations to Transport for a start and just follow your nose.
Take care
Bob

I followed my rather large nose and re read the authorization to transport section of c 68 - still no offence listed in the section -
Specifically , where did you find the offence of shooting a restricted firearm in a place other than a range certified for restricted firearms ?
![]()
OK hows this. I'm going on my honeymoon in September and want to leave my hand gun and long guns at a friends house who has an rpal. can I get an att to his house and leave them there locked up?
Bob, the above simply states the purpose for which an ATT may be issued, such as for 19(1)(a) shooting at an approved range.
Can you show in any way that this is a prohibition against discharge at the place of dwelling? It appears to only list a legitimate reason for the issuance of an ATT, and in no way be intended as a restriction on use.
S.17 says where you can possess it. It doesn't say anything about where you may discharge it. Where does it prohibit the discharge of it at the dwelling place?
If you can only be in possession of the firearm as stated how can you shoot it in any other place?
Take Care
Bob
No you cannot, unless the following applies to you
restricted firearms can only be discharged at an approved CFO range
Probably, but is your friend a member of the same shooting club as you?
If so, you could give them (along with the registration certificates) to your friend and they already have an ATT to go home from the club with restricted firearms. No new ATT would be needed.
Are you afraid to store your guns at home while you are away?
I have a large gun collection and my family and I travel a lot. Once your collection grows you'll forget about that each time you leave town. Just keep them properly stored and that is enough. You have a life to live like everyone else, someone could rob your house while you are at work, or grocery shopping, or at the range even. Don't get too worried.
Have a great honeymoon, and congratulations on the wedding!
If you can only be in possession of the firearm as stated. I don't understand what you mean. You can possess it at your place of dwelling. You are not arguing against that are you?
In order to not be able to discharge it there (dwelling place) legally, there has to be a prohibition. Where is the prohibition against discharging it at your place of dwelling?
would it not be because your dwelling is not an approved range ?
and if it is then you can go right ahead and shoot what ever you want....
which is why I said
What I mean is the law says where you can be in possession of a restricted or prohibitive firearm. Being in possession in your backyard isn't covered ergo shooting it there means you are in possession outside of where you are allowed under the act.
If you feel different or think you know better then do what you want and take your chances. I have a pretty good idea what a judge is going to tell you. Seems to be pretty clear.
Take Care
Bob
OK hows this. I'm going on my honeymoon in September and want to leave my hand gun and long guns at a friends house who has an rpal. can I get an att to his house and leave them there locked up?
thanks bud. I'm sure it'll be great. gonna be gone for around two weeks to Europe so hopefully its as good as we hope.
my buddy has an rpal but isn't a range member. all of my guns are stored in a crappy tire ten gun locker that's anchored to a wall with tapcons. I'm not concerned with day trips here and there but I worry if someone has an extended amount of time they may get into it. just being paranoid I'm sure. only friends of mine know what I have and when were leaving and I've got a buddy who watches the house for us. trying to be safe but paranoid at the same time you know.
Where is the prohibition against discharging a restricted firearm at any place other than an approved range? We see only reference to transportation to approved ranges as being a legitimate reason for the issuance of an ATT. But that's not a prohibition against discharge at a place of dwelling. This argument got very circular last time it came up.
I wouldn't argue that you can shoot it in your backyard. I would argue that no one has brought up a restriction against discharging it within your place of dwelling, as impractical as that may be. Maybe out in the country you could shoot down in your basement. Or even fire an AR-15 out your window at a target in a field.



























