IMO this VS is totally not fair to the 10-22, It is fair to use a slingshot to VS a 10-22. I had a 10-22 and it put a smile on my face when the day I sold it. The worst semi auto rifle design ever.
Trigun
IMO this VS is totally not fair to the 10-22, It is fair to use a slingshot to VS a 10-22. I had a 10-22 and it put a smile on my face when the day I sold it. The worst semi auto rifle design ever.
Trigun
And now the savage Mark II. This is the bottom line Mark II ($209) with the sporter barrel and a $50 Simmons scope. I only took one group with this rifle as it seems to illustrate the point well. I used Winchester bulk 500 box ammo for this rifle. It shoots sub-MOA.
![]()
Finally, this is the ruger 10/22 with the same scope. This is the absolute BEST grouping I could get with this gun out of 15 using various ammo. I don't know how ANYONE can claim the 10/22 is even a remotely accurate rifle in stock form. If the bullseye in these pictures is a gopher's head, I sure as hell wouldn't want that 10/22!
![]()
First of all, nice groups with both.
Secondly, where can you buy a new Savage Mk II for $209?
First of all, nice groups with both.
Secondly, where can you buy a new Savage Mk II for $209?
Seriously?
Not a lot. There are a lot better guns on the market than the 10/22 but most of them lack the ability to install mods/tinker with them.
Seriously?
![]()
How would the Remington Model Five rate compared to the Savage? WSS has it for $220 and it has a nice looking wood stock. The Savage groups speak for themselves, but I'm curious if anyone's had similar results with the Five.
Voxx, well, that rifle is actually a rebranded Zastava. It has a lot of trigger creep and it seems to group at .75" at 50 yards. Far inferior to the savage in my experience.
Love how I post a picture of a bone stock 10/22 doing very well (for a semi) and no one says s**t.
Thread ender, I guess.
Love how I post a picture of a bone stock 10/22 doing very well (for a semi) and no one says s**t.
Thread ender, I guess.
Hardly. first, that looks rather....not authentic. If it is, sorry, but you've definitely got an outlier there. It's absolutely not typical for the 10/22.
I tested 15 different rounds, of the 15 I ended up with 5-6 that works well in it.
People need to test their gun, with other rounds then fed bulk pack.
Thankfully shooters ridge are releasing a 25 round mag for marlins in April/may which ought to boost sales of the 795. Considering you can get ATI tactical stocks and soon 25 rounders for a model 795... I think anyone in their right mind would buy that over a 10/22 unless you want a money pit of a gun. Also the rugers are everywhere and the EE is perpetually saturated with them meaning they instantly lose value as soon as you open the box if you buy a new one. It's an illogical investment IMHO.
??? How about, no matter how horrible that ruger shoots, It's still an overpriced fixer upper out of the box... What the hell? Savage has good QC and produces well built guns that consistantly shoot great from gun to gun. What you said makes no sense.
Hardly. first, that looks rather....not authentic. If it is, sorry, but you've definitely got an outlier there. It's absolutely not typical for the 10/22.