Thank you smellie! Every post you make is tuition-free learning!
Actually (as a die-hard Euklund fan), The Rashid has a weakness in it's trigger group( Afficionados correct at will) in that there's a component that can shear and, be very difficult to spot with the eye (dr.google...). The one I've had my hands on was tip-top (minus ugly cammo paint)
Re: Mag, like it's "counterpart" (SKS) it was designed for stripper-clips and, can be loaded (lol, not by me...) faster than a mag-swap
I'm not sure it's true "red" counter-part (SKS) is worse for "durability"...when the factory was re-vamped it was for a "next generation" of tool. Don't mis-read as, I do love 'em! (and Ljungman and Hakim).
Nope, with an ambi-dexterious rifle like this, you have the opportunity to do it twice! (and be the brunt of fellow soldier's jokes for the rest of your thumbless career)
It is too bad that the Rashid was a dead end.
Political considerations aside, I think the Rashid could even have have been the better weapon, simply with the addition of a larger capacity detachable magazine and a simplified magazine catch, allowing it to be used as such.
Actually (as a die-hard Euklund fan), The Rashid has a weakness in it's trigger group( Afficionados correct at will) in that there's a component that can shear and, be very difficult to spot with the eye (dr.google...). The one I've had my hands on was tip-top (minus ugly cammo paint)
Re: Mag, like it's "counterpart" (SKS) it was designed for stripper-clips and, can be loaded (lol, not by me...) faster than a mag-swap
I'm not sure it's true "red" counter-part (SKS) is worse for "durability"...when the factory was re-vamped it was for a "next generation" of tool. Don't mis-read as, I do love 'em! (and Ljungman and Hakim).
you only do it once !!!!! .........
Nope, with an ambi-dexterious rifle like this, you have the opportunity to do it twice! (and be the brunt of fellow soldier's jokes for the rest of your thumbless career)


















































