Come on, Groundskeeper. What have you been smoking? Anyone with even a basic knowledge of tactical tasking and perimeter defense knows that as far as pugshot is concerned, initial and terminal velocity are irrelevant. With standard lead/copper/steel projectiles, the terminal effect of projectiles is based on terminal ballistics, regardless of the tactical perimeter layout. Cinder block and other barriers can be used to moderate or block impact of said projectiles. With pugshot, it is the inherent ability of either radioactive of traditional pugshot to chew its way through any barrier that is critical. Therefore, for tactical tasking in perimeter defense, the best assault rifle is one which can accurately fire pugshot. However, if you are using pugshot as a strategic force in barrier breakdown, you must keep advancing troops far enough back from the pugshot, or use a rear aperture deflector, to prevent harm from chewed up cinder block coming out the opposite end of the pugshot canister. So please, Groundskeeper, do your homework before posting drivel on the forum. Might I recommend reading "The art of warfare" by Pug Tzu?
