argh,.bad ideas at GLobal Village

Obviously you ignored the fact that my information comes from USPSA match directors. Now you going to argue that those guys don't know who can or can't shoot their matches?
Little boy, it has nothing to do with what USPSA Match Directors tell you. It's you thinking you can correct Vinny on so many issues when you don't have a clue.


Who cares how many action air members Philippines has? Follow the link from my message and see with your own eyes that Canada officially has 2nd place for 2010 on a membership. It is not my fault if some IPSC secretary got the facts wrong and published them on the web site.
Little boy, the PPSA has +4,000 IPSC real gun shooters. And Canada is NOT in 2nd place. if you read Mr. Quigley's post here, he understands that the top 9 countires are all scored "1", which means they've all reached have the maximum and they tie for 1st place, but they are listed alphabetically.

Using your silliness, Canada is larger than the USA. Who's the dumb guy now?

:rolleyes:
 
You silly people; any cretin domiciled in Hong Kong is far smarter and knows way more than anyone else in the whole wide world. It is useless to argue or even discuss any topic with such persons as the are always right and you are always wrong because the are the smartest most knowledgeable people extant. Trying to convince any of them of anything is like trying to teach a pig to sing: it will frustrate you and annoy the pig.
I would never try teaching you to sing. I showed your photo to a couple of pigs hoping to get you a girlfriend, but they just snorted and farted. Ha!

:D
 
Little boy, it has nothing to do with what USPSA Match Directors tell you. It's you thinking you can correct Vinny on so many issues when you don't have a clue.



Little boy, the PPSA has +4,000 IPSC real gun shooters. And Canada is NOT in 2nd place. if you read Mr. Quigley's post here, he understands that the top 9 countires are all scored "1", which means they all have the maximum, but they are listed alphabetically. Using your silliness, Canada is larger than the USA.

:rolleyes:

What I don't understand is why you haven't been banned yet??

When ever you come on this forum you do nothing but stir s**t.

Go away.......

:feedTroll:

John
 
Which was??

And again....what am I missing??

Aren't these 'proposed changes' - published to elicit discussion and feedback via our representative at the GA??


John

exactly, and he didn't like the feed back so he shut down the thread.
"1911-genre" is pretty vague. extended heavy dustcovers are allowed but there is no limit to the weight so a "pelican" dust cover on a 1911 is not in violation. Heavy bull barrels are allowed, again with no restriction, so a sight tracker barrel is not in violation. agun with these two modifications will accept any 1911 part so how is it not "1911-genre"? The guns that will exist in this division will just be a low capacity Standard guns, so why bother. 1911 single stack society rules/uspsa single stack was where the idea started and ipsc just went and fuct it right up.
 
What do you guys do at the GV?

I go there to ask questions and offer my opinion...hopefully in a reasonable and repectful manner.

You attitude on this forum is very unfortunate. It adds absolutely nothing to the reputation of IPSC shooters or adminastrators. Disappointing :(


John
 
Last edited:
exactly, and he didn't like the feed back so he shut down the thread.
"1911-genre" is pretty vague. extended heavy dustcovers are allowed but there is no limit to the weight so a "pelican" dust cover on a 1911 is not in violation. Heavy bull barrels are allowed, again with no restriction, so a sight tracker barrel is not in violation. agun with these two modifications will accept any 1911 part so how is it not "1911-genre"? The guns that will exist in this division will just be a low capacity Standard guns, so why bother. 1911 single stack society rules/uspsa single stack was where the idea started and ipsc just went and fuct it right up.

Told ya so, I've been saying for a year thatthey'd screw it up. IPSC could take any good idea and make a mess of it. It seems to me they, and I'm not pointing at any one person but IPSC management in general, look at something the US is doing and decide to do it too, then because there is such an anti-US bias, they change everything about it and end up with a mess just to be different. Look at ICS, instead of copying the US classification system which works pretty good, they made ICS which is just full of fail. Now SS is going down the same road.
 
almost seems like the divisons proposal is ment to be a failure. Would be interesting to see how a vote at the GA would go if given the choice between the 2
 
Interesting theory

I don't know but I just find it interesting that:
- Anytime one of us starts questioning Vince, pokpok1964 shows up here almost immediately.
- Anyone ever see her post anything on the GV? I admit I don't really read the airsoft section maybe she is active there.
- Some of her statements have been very Vince esc in the use of the English language.
- pokpok1964 and Vince both within hour tell us to F off and join USPSA.

I don't know maybe I just need to re adjust my tin foil hat.
 
I am saying that pok-pok is Mr Pinto for long time.
Just take a look how he lost the cool against Eugene, calling him a "little person".
This sound so much like 'Dark Vader'
 
Back
Top Bottom