The difference between the 7mm-08 and 260 Rem is small change, at best. But wait, the 7x57 was here 100 years before. The 6.5x55 has more pizazz than the 260 Remington. Funny thing, it was invented 100 years ago too. Not much new under the ballistic sun.
New cartridges are made to sell rifles to people who are bored with those cartridges that are currently available. Good on you, if you need 'em.
Don't know about all this pie are square and cakes are round stuff.
Load'em up, put the cross hairs where they belong and booooom drt.
Funny with the Gatehouse character...................
I just zip right by his posts as there is waaaaay too much hostility there.
Seems the chap/chaperette likes to argue up/down no matter if the sky is blue
today.
Yep Gatehouse, I'm refering to you.
Have at'er..........
Also modern 308-based cartridges are way more accuracy than the previous cartridge that they replace. That was a huge reason in the success of 7mm-08 Rem and 260 Rem as rifle silouhette rounds. Even 243 Win is more accurate than 244/6mm Rem because it work in a short action.
Alex
Pie are ROUND , cake are SQUARE!!!
That is why you may have ballistics issues.
Are you folks still arguing about this .260 thing???
We need to start a new thread, who can't harvest a game animal with a .260, that'll cause a stir!

Also modern 308-based cartridges are way more accuracy than the previous cartridge that they replace. That was a huge reason in the success of 7mm-08 Rem and 260 Rem as rifle silouhette rounds. Even 243 Win is more accurate than 244/6mm Rem because it work in a short action.
Alex
The 257 Weatherby would be ideal for that purpose, though I'm sure some on here may consider the recoil of this "massive" quarterbore intolerable. Best to add a brake.I like the idea of a long range deer and antelope cartridge with mild recoil that could still smack a moose down at 200.




























