Hi!
I have seen on the net a Muzzle Brake for a Rugger 10/22... But I can believe it could really low down recoil. It's already so low... lol
Did you think it could make a difference?
Thank you.
...gun totin' hip gangster wannabe's...
If the recoil on a 10/22 was any lighter it wouldn't cycle the action.
I spy a Tool fan? ... Learn to swim!![]()
Haha, my thoughts exactly. I cant beleave someone beat me to it.
The true purpose of a brake on a 22 is because of the poorly molded bullet bases. They are prone to irregular shapes and irregular gas escape at the exit, stabilizing each bullet differently - different POI on target.
A brake minimizes the gas at the base of the bullet on exit thus making the bullet more consistantly stable, thus more accurate.
The perceived purpose of a 22 brake is for wannabe commandos with 22's.
![]()
Hey...it really reduced my almost zero recoil to almost zero!At least my son thinks it looks cool on the 16.5"bbl 597!
[/IMG]![]()
I'm sorry, but did you just make that up? Because that sounds absurd! Why then do we not see muzzle breaks on anschutz, Cooper, volquartzen or suhl rifles? rather we see them only on mossberg plinksters and tactical .22's?
It's a crazy concept, and what you are saying is taken care of by a good crown. Once the bullet has left the bore any gases escaping at an angle away from the bullet are heading "away" from the bullet regardless of whether there is a muzzle break or not. Therefore how could those gasses affect the bullet at all to begin with?

I tried it as a result of tests by the Ohio Bench Rest Association using .22 rail guns.
And yes the research proved valid as I tested and noticed a substantial improvement in accuracy with the brake.
Contact Volquartsen as they manufacture brakes for bench rest .22 rifles for further facts.
If you believe your theory - test it -
Try center fire bullets with a significantly different bases (different little nicks, gouges etc. just like the moulded bases of .22's) then compare to similar bases.
You will see.
"aha! I see" said the blind man - but he couldnt really see at all.![]()
Interesting... After researching it a bit I must pull my foot out of my mouth. I don't think I'll ever use one because honestly I don't care to improve on my groups by margins of 1/32" but there are those who do.
But I found references to the use of them "stripping" the surrounding swirling gasses away from the bullet in the first foot or so of flight, making for a less turbulent departure from the barrel. My apologies, you were right. But from what I could find the accuracy improvements are rather minute.
...still, they look so ridiculous I don't think it's worth the trade off in very, very marginal accuracy gains.
That looks pretty cool John, I may look into one just because it look better than the stock front site that I don't even use.[/IMG]![]()
And that looks like a birdcage flash suppressor, not a muzzle brake. However equally as useful. I must say it does look cool though!
I wouldn't use a conventional brake on a 22lr, ever. You risk much greater exposure to lead through deflection of particulate matter by the brake back at the shooter. I've said this before and got raked over the coals for it....meh.
I did do some testing on a Dlask re-worked Levang comp last summer and had very positive results on accuracy. The Levang forces gases out the front of the brake and strips gasses away from the bullet to help minimize any negative effects on accuracy. Also, it doesn't spit poisonous s**t back at you.

I spy a Tool fan? ... Learn to swim!![]()



























