Suggestions on .22's

Yeah, you're right.......:rolleyes: Simple mechanical devices confuse you?

Just because it gets easier with practice doesn't make it a better design. I stick to my original statement that the take down is horrible.

Compare it with other pistols available, it is much worse, some might say.... horrible.
 
Just because it gets easier with practice doesn't make it a better design. I stick to my original statement that the take down is horrible.

Compare it with other pistols available, it is much worse, some might say.... horrible.

Are you referring to the Browning?
 
The Legend of William Ruger and the Curse on his .22 semi-automatic pistol
as told by Dr. FrankenRuger


The story goes that Bill Ruger wanted to make the greatest .22 semi-auto pistol ever manufactured. So for years he tried and continuously failed to achieve his goal. Supposedly, one dark moonless night, Bill Ruger was working in his garage, on the .22 pistol he wished to create, when he severely cut his hand. He quickly threw a towel over the wound and at the same time exclaimed, “ Damn Gun! To Hell with you!”


Just by coincidence, the clock struck midnight, and as this happened, Bill Ruger heard a noise from behind him. “ I can help you with that gun.”, said a voice from the darkness outside the garage.


“Huh... Who’s out there?”, Bill asked.


“Just a man passing by.”, the stranger replied as he stepped into Bill’s shop. “ I heard what you said and I have here the plans for the perfect .22 semi-auto pistol.”


Bill, the shrewd business man he was, looked at the man and said, “What will it cost me?”


The man replied, “Your Soul.”


Bill said, “Well let me take a look first, I wanna see what I’m gettin.”


The man rolled out the prints and showed Bill Ruger the design for the greatest .22 semi-auto pistol ever. Bill looked them over real close and studied them as quick as he could, but before he could see how the Takedown Mechanism worked, the Stranger rolled up the plans.


“Now sign here if you want to see the rest.”, The man pointed his boney finger to the bottom of a 2,871 page contract.


Bill looked at it and said, “Heck NO! What do you think I am? CRAZY?"


Bill reached over and grabbed a gun that was leaning against the wall and pointed it at the stranger, “Now get out of here before I blast you with this shotgun.”, he said in a threatening voice.


The man backed out the doorway into the night and as he did he said, “ I Curse you Bill Ruger and your .22 semi-auto pistol. Anyone who tries to take your gun apart and put it back together again, will suffer pain and agony beyond anything on earth.”

Before he could forget what he saw, Bill quickly set to work on making the pistol, but soon ran into problems. Everything was going along perfect until he got to the Takedown Mechanism. Since the stranger had rolled up the plans before he saw how it was assembled, he could not figure out how to make it work. So he made the pistol as close to perfect as he could get it.

:p
 
Sometimes Mk3 is breaking the retaining pin of the firing pin
on the models where they used a roll-pin instead of solid,
and because of that, also (rare) the rebound spring of the firing pin.
 
Yeah, you're right.......:rolleyes: Simple mechanical devices confuse you?

You seem like a nice person why contest something so hotly when it's widely accepted that the Ruger is a tough strip. This doesn't take away from it's function or value. To deny this reality is a little obtuse.
 
You seem like a nice person why contest something so hotly when it's widely accepted that the Ruger is a tough strip. This doesn't take away from it's function or value. To deny this reality is a little obtuse.

Because I don't want new shooters to miss out on what is probably the best .22 for under $800 just because they heard it is ''horrible'' to strip.
Not trying to debate, just giving my opinion.
 
Because I don't want new shooters to miss out on what is probably the best .22 for under $800 just because they heard it is ''horrible'' to strip.
Not trying to debate, just giving my opinion.

Understood. It's better stated that this is a GREAT pistol but just like everything else in life, not perfect.

Your opinion is valid but make clear that this is not an easy strip. You went as far as to insult someone's intelligence. For what? The sanctity of the Ruger Mk? lol.
 
i have to watch that youtube video on how to dissasemble it every time i take my mk iii apart :(

edit:

on a side note, i had major difficulties taking my mkiii apart the first time. it had to do with the internal locking screw thing, if over or under tightened, the locking screw can prevent the main spring housing from coming out. the firearm also being in the "fire" position, also means that the user can no longer adjust the screw back to where it needs to be. i had to push out enough pins until the entire pistol fell apart and had to do a full re-assemble. ever since then, i've never touched the internal lock again
 
Because I don't want new shooters to miss out on what is probably the best .22 for under $800 just because they heard it is ''horrible'' to strip.
Not trying to debate, just giving my opinion.

I said plenty of good things about the MKIII but new buyers should be warned about the take down. I love my MKIII when I shoot it, I just like it a little bit less while cleaning it.
 
I learned to shoot pistols on a Ruger MkII. You don't need to take them apart that often if shooting half decent ammo. We had club guns and they were rarely stripped and cleaned. Just a patch down them once in a while. They fired anything you loaded in them and were damn accurate. My Chiappa is pretty accurate and fun to shoot but it pales in comparison to any Ruger MK pistol. I plan on getting a MKIII stainless as the pinnacle to my .22 collection. I don't need anything better than that.
 
I plan on getting a MKIII stainless as the pinnacle to my .22 collection.

Just out of curiosity why stainless? Not that there's anything wrong with your choice but I don't understand the love affair for stainless steel firearms. Is it that aesthetically pleasing that your willing to pay $100 more?

I'm not trying to blast/flame you, just trying to wrap my head around it.
 
Just out of curiosity why stainless? Not that there's anything wrong with your choice but I don't understand the love affair for stainless steel firearms. Is it that aesthetically pleasing that your willing to pay $100 more?

I'm not trying to blast/flame you, just trying to wrap my head around it.

I'd buy one in stainless because it reminds of the AWC Amphibian:

awc_amphinian_mk2_ss.jpg


One day I will have one.....
 
Smith & Wesson
Browning
Ruger

All cheap, decent guns. I've got the S&W 22a-1 myself, they go for like $300. Lots of Youtube vids on takedown, not as daunting as you'd think but order up recoil buffers by the dozen to make sure you've always got some on hand (it comes with two spares).
 
Looks like I've actually decided to go with the Ruger MKIII despite the "difficult" takedown. Saw a video on Youtube where they showed how the takedown is actually easier when the magazine is left in the gun...

Anyways, the Target model is really nice with the thick barrel (Bull barrel???). Thanks everyone (particularly cadgo) - I wouldn't have even considered had I not asked the question. yeah it's a little more than a lot of the others, but hey...

Thanks again!!!

BTW, Cadgo, Where did you get the image of the Ruger you just posted, I really like how smooth that one looks, which one is that? Is it available in Canada?

10103.jpg
 
BTW, Cadgo, Where did you get the image of the Ruger you just posted, I really like how smooth that one looks, which one is that? Is it available in Canada?[/IMG]

It's seems you have a love affair with Cadgo (It's not like I pushed for the Ruger before him ;)) so I should let him answer but I'm too nice.

It has a built in suppressor. That's should tell you everything you need to know.
 
Back
Top Bottom