My son and I place the animal in a bedded position with it's front and rear legs tucked in. Always sit behind the animal, no gun, no tongue hanging out, no hat on backwards, no sun glasses and clean up as much blood off the animal.






I find this somewhat dis-respectful of the animal that was killed
If you are worried about dis respecting the animal, maybe NOT killing the animal would be a good start? The animals in hunting pics are no less dead if they are cleaned off
My opinion as well. I'm thinking the downed animal could care less if the gun/bow/spear/boomerang/slingshot/baseball bat/large rock etc, is in or out of the picture frame.I always try to pose the animal tastefully, clean up the blood and keep extraneous crap out of the photo- quads, rope, etc. Usually place them upright as well. But my rifle belongs in that photo more than I do, in my humble opinion. Not hung across the rack, but tastefully present.
Hunters are "under the gun" at present, so why add ammo for the antis?
The only difference between a "garbage" photo and a magazing photo is a few minutes prep time. You then end up with a photo that you won't be shy of showing anyone.
I've been guiding for 35 years and have always prepped before photos, .........never had a client complain after seeing the resulting photos! Writers in particular are more than aware of how a "disrespectful" photo can result in them not selling the story or creating an "issue" for a magazine. Think of the photos you see at the sportshows, ......they're all well posed and clean, and you get excited. The "blood & guts" photos turn you off and you get a different impression of the hunter. Guess it can summed up as "class hunter" you'd like to hunt with versus "slob" hunter that you'd avoid.
It only takes a couple of minutes to portray that "class" or "slob", ........it's your choice!!!
So it makes one a "slob hunter" if one doesnt take the time to make his picture of a dead animal all purdy and look like the animal wasn't killed? Just to make sure one doesn't offend some ass hats. Its nothing to do with "class hunter" or "slob hunter". I have to laugh at all the people that think they are superior hunters beause "i take profesional pictures of what I just killed" or "I hunt with a Cooper" and on and on and on.
IMO what he is trying to say is lets make us look like professionals and we know what we are doing and that we care.
Same thing as photos for a car for sale or show, nice and clean or dirty and rusty.A lot has to do with impressions.If you walk into a disorganized hunting/fishing store vs a well cared for one you get an impression right off the bat do you not?
Great photos track, and to the guys who don't care how the photos look and take a bloody, tongue out shot, hey that's your thing. What some of us are saying here is that game animals have dignity, and we feel presenting them tastefully respects that. Nothing benefits from the "In your face, this is how it is" approach- and the photos just plain look bad, I like to have some of mine on the wall.
Great photos track, and to the guys who don't care how the photos look and take a bloody, tongue out shot, hey that's your thing. What some of us are saying here is that game animals have dignity, and we feel presenting them tastefully respects that. Nothing benefits from the "In your face, this is how it is" approach- and the photos just plain look bad, I like to have some of mine on the wall.