Gun Registry New Rules

So.... I guess this sounds like a stupid question, but what happens with sales in progress? I bought a rifle off a guy on here Friday afternoon. He couldn't get through to the CFC before they closed. So, on Tuesday when everything is open again, can he just ship it to me without the approval?
 
I understand that C-19 has had royal assent - has it been proclaimed? When I'm sure of that, my LGR slips go to the confetti shredder...
W
 
Don't throw em out. Shoot em. Frame em. Put them on the wall. A reminder of how easy a party (liberals) will take your rights and freedoms and how hard and long one has to fight toget them back.

Never forget.
 
wigglenator said:
Don't throw em out. Shoot em. Frame em. Put them on the wall. A reminder of how easy a party (liberals) will take your rights and freedoms and how hard and long one has to fight toget them back.

Never forget.
Click to expand...

I'm with you....never forget. And let's not sit back and pat ourselves on the back as job well done either. Lets start lobbying for some logic based regulations regarding the prohibs. Demonizing a specific calibre makes no more sense than putting restrictions on a firearm based on its looks.

Ok, I admit I'm a being a little self serving....a Colt New Service in .32-20 is top of my wish list.....still, I can't be the ONLY one who'd like to see .25s and .32s off the fed's hit list?
 
Prairieshooter said:
I'm with you....never forget. And let's not sit back and pat ourselves on the back as job well done either. Lets start lobbying for some logic based regulations regarding the prohibs. Demonizing a specific calibre makes no more sense than putting restrictions on a firearm based on its looks.

Ok, I admit I'm a being a little self serving....a Colt New Service in .32-20 is top of my wish list.....still, I can't be the ONLY one who'd like to see .25s and .32s off the fed's hit list?
Click to expand...

What.

You don't see the logic in banning a hand gun with a 105mm barrel, yet allowing hand guns with a 106mm barrel?

Or the brilliance in banning .25 and .32 calibre's while allowing the bigger more powerful .40 S&W and .45 ACP???

Back to the re-education centre for you!
 
soulchaser said:
What.

You don't see the logic in banning a hand gun with a 105mm barrel, yet allowing hand guns with a 106mm barrel?

Or the brilliance in banning .25 and .32 calibre's while allowing the bigger more powerful .40 S&W and .45 ACP???

Back to the re-education centre for you!
Click to expand...

Seriously though, .25, .32's and barrels under 105mm were banned because it allowed the liberals to seize more than 50% of the hand guns held by individuals with the swipe of a pen.

Of course they claimed it was because 105mm barrels were "to easily concealable" by criminals.

Yeah, OK. That extra millimeter makes it impossible for criminals to stick it in their pocket?
 
PS: I hade to quote myself to add more to the post, because for some reason I have lost the ability to edit my own posts.

Has this happened to anyone else????
 
soulchaser said:
Seriously though, .25, .32's and barrels under 105mm were banned because it allowed the liberals to seize more than 50% of the hand guns held by individuals with the swipe of a pen.

Of course they claimed it was because 105mm barrels were "to easily concealable" by criminals.

Yeah, OK. That extra millimeter makes it impossible for criminals to stick it in their pocket?
Click to expand...

Good point....handguns are already pretty easily concealed...that's why they are restricted in the first place!...otherwise you'd see criminals sawing off 6" revolver barrels to make snubbies out of 'em.

Of course you're also right, that the law WAS intended to remove guns from circulation, but I somehow doubt that the gangs and the drug dealers have been hindered much by the lack of .32s, .25s and <105 mm barrels.
 
soulchaser said:
Seriously though, .25, .32's and barrels under 105mm were banned because it allowed the liberals to seize more than 50% of the hand guns held by individuals with the swipe of a pen.

Of course they claimed it was because 105mm barrels were "to easily concealable" by criminals.

Yeah, OK. That extra millimeter makes it impossible for criminals to stick it in their pocket?
Click to expand...

The 32's that were over had to be exempted 'cuz they were Olympic firearms . Liberal stupidity at its finest !
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom