please delete

robchar said:
Owned a aug years ago and feed the need to own a bullpup again. Trying to decide whether to buy an FN FS2000 or a Tavor. I would like some feed back from those who have owned and used either.
Thanks
Rob
Click to expand...

Have both, use both - love both.

FS2000 - lighter, better ergonomics, more accurate, better trigger, low-maintenance; picky with magazines (metal only)
Tavor - looks cooler, more rail space, bipod adapter, takes all magazines, easier to clean, cheaper $$; trigger sucks
 
blaxsun said:
Have both, use both - love both.

FS2000 - lighter, better ergonomics, more accurate, better trigger, low-maintenance; picky with magazines (metal only)
Tavor - looks cooler, more rail space, bipod adapter, takes all magazines, easier to clean, cheaper $$; trigger sucks
Click to expand...

I agree with most of that, but with a few additional comments:

  • I think the Tavor ergonomics are great, once you get used to them. I love the thumb-actuated mag release, and the location of the bolt release
  • FS2000 doesn't lock open after the last round is fired - that was a deal breaker for me when I was considering it or the Tavor
I only have a Tavor, though, and while I have had the chance to examine an FS2000, I haven't shot one. So, take my view with a grain of salt.
 
CobraGT said:
I agree with most of that, but with a few additional comments:

  • I think the Tavor ergonomics are great, once you get used to them. I love the thumb-actuated mag release, and the location of the bolt release
  • FS2000 doesn't lock open after the last round is fired - that was a deal breaker for me when I was considering it or the Tavor
I only have a Tavor, though, and while I have had the chance to examine an FS2000, I haven't shot one. So, take my view with a grain of salt.
Click to expand...

Absolutely - the ergonomics on the Tavor are great; I just find the ones on the FS2000 to be slightly better.

Ebola said:
also you can only purchase a tavor new right now. FS200 are no longer sold in canada as far as i know.
Click to expand...

To be sure - non-restricted FS2000's are unobtanium at the moment...
 
Does anyone know how much it is to re-barrel a FS2000 to non-restricted? I see now that questar is pre-selling the restricted version, and wonder what it would cost to switch it over.
 
vancity said:
Does anyone know how much it is to re-barrel a FS2000 to non-restricted? I see now that questar is pre-selling the restricted version, and wonder what it would cost to switch it over.
Click to expand...

Around $500-$600 (estimate). But honestly, with a 24-week wait time - get a Tavor. By the time you add the NR barrel and tri-rail (to get the same real estate) you'll be looking at over $4k. If a cheap NR FS2000 pops up on the EE - you can always snag it!
 
bilkathegerman said:
I have both (both non restricted), the trigger makes the FS a better gun IMO even if the tavor is cheaper, better looking... Also the FN feels better build and stays cleaner. When you shoot the FN it's not that much bulkier than a tavor. And belgians are nicer than israelis in general!:D
Click to expand...

I think if you can acquire an FS2000 for within +$500 of a Tavor, it's going to be a tough decision. +$1,000-$1,200 difference though...
 
blaxsun said:
Absolutely - the ergonomics on the Tavor are great; I just find the ones on the FS2000 to be slightly better.
Click to expand...


I've never tried a FS2000. They disappeared before I was ready to get one. Can you do the fast mag changes like the Tavor with the FS2000?

Also the trigger on my Tavor isn't bad at all. Heavy but fairly crisp. I still have both springs on mine. Maybe I was just lucky but the trigger on mine doesn't stand out as bad. It's not match grade but it's not bad at all.
 
Am looking at the Tavor too

I played with the FN2000 and found it bulky and I dont like chamber cover.
 
Epoxy7 said:
Also the trigger on my Tavor isn't bad at all. Heavy but fairly crisp. I still have both springs on mine. Maybe I was just lucky but the trigger on mine doesn't stand out as bad. It's not match grade but it's not bad at all.
Click to expand...

I agree - I don't mind it as much as some. The Tavor's trigger is universally despised, so that's what I usually go with.
 
Haven't shot a Tavor yet (I have one ordered) but I really like my FS2000. Enough that I am going to get it re-barreled to non restricted. Peoples first reaction when they see it is "holy crap that looks bulky" , then I let them handle it and their tune changes once they throw it up to their shoulder. Then they go "holy crap, that fits like a glove!"
 
8 ball said:
Haven't shot a Tavor yet (I have one ordered) but I really like my FS2000. Enough that I am going to get it re-barreled to non restricted. Peoples first reaction when they see it is "holy crap that looks bulky" , then I let them handle it and their tune changes once they throw it up to their shoulder. Then they go "holy crap, that fits like a glove!"
Click to expand...

At first glance it does look bulky, but looks can be deceiving. As you've pointed out, it's actually very ergonomic and feels great once you actually hold and handle it a bit. The only downside (as has been pointed out) as that they're somewhat unobtanium at the moment, and there is the additional cost to re-barrel it if you have the restricted version.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom