Since you already have the press etc, ... reloading .40s&w will save you more than 9mm does, %-wise.
Crunch your numbers here: http://handloads.com/calc/loadingCosts.asp
Since you already have the press etc, ... reloading .40s&w will save you more than 9mm does, %-wise.
Crunch your numbers here: http://handloads.com/calc/loadingCosts.asp
It's my opinion that reloading isn't cheaper, because you just shoot more.
Exactly

to the op. Are you kidding us? You already reload 9mm and .45 and ask us if reloading .40 is worth it?
Silly foo. You should save at least $6/box or $12/100 rounds. Do you shoot 4-500 rounds a year? If so you just paid for the set of dies and shell holder in a year.
If you shoot more than a few boxes of centerfire ammo a year, of course you should reload!![]()
ouuuch!!!
It's my opinion that reloading isn't cheaper, because you just shoot more.

It's my opinion that reloading isn't cheaper, because you just shoot more.
Everyone likes to chime in with this same statement every time someone asks about the value of reloading and frankly I think it's a bit cliche and not as applicable as people like to think it is. Sure you might shoot more, but another guy might not. Now that I'm reloading .308, I'm still only shooting 1 or 2 boxes of ammo in a given day. Given the need to let the barrel cool between shots and my shoulder only wanting to take so many kicks in one afternoon, I am not shooting any more ammo than I would have if I was paying for factory ammo. I'm just paying less for it.
I realize the statement has some truth in a lot of cases, but I think just pipping up to tell someone they won't save anything is a waste of time.
Yes, you will save money on .40 reloading. Every box you shoot will be cheaper. Voila! You're paying less for ammo. Whether your annual ammo budget has changed is irrelevant. You're saving money per round. That's *saving money*. Enjoy it.



























