Hey CGNs!
Well, I've used, almost to the point of abuse haha, the search function on the forum but there are always big gaps where I would like questions answered so at the risk of repeating previously posted questions that could not be unearthed, here goes...
I've recently decided that I'd like my first rifle to be:
-reasonably inexpensive initial purchase ($600 max)
-tough
-cheap to shoot
-not a 22lr (desire somewhat serious stopping power past the 150m mark)
-possibly semi-auto?
with the added interest of history and a story behind it.
I spend a lot of time in the bush and up until now have hunted with both traditional and compound bows, however there are some things a bow just cannot replace a good rifle in doing, anyways I digress...
When I started looking I had my heart set on a K98k, then various 8mm mauser variants m48/24/47 etc... this was partially due to me finding them to be a really attractive rifle and I loved the idea of having a 1000 yard rifle that could take a beating in the woods. then I discovered swedish mausers and really fell in love with the m38/96 and the 6.5x55 round, and was really disheartend to come to the conclusion that it would be a very pricey gun to shoot even after purchasing hand-loading equipment if I so chose in the future.
Enter the last phase I've been questioning, part of the purpose is reliable self-defense in the boreal of northern Canada (cougars scare me more then zombie apocalypses haha), should I be looking more seriously at semi-automatic rifles?
so I started looking at the m305b and the sks, obviously the sks fits the cheap bill, and it's tough, ammo is super easy to get but it's reliability as a large game hunting rifle out past 200 yards is easily questionable at best? The m305's accuracy at longer ranges has me interested and it is a nice rifle but I don't really trust the reliability portion as well as 7.62 nato being considerably more expensive then 7.63x39.
So as you can see, I've really only scratched the surface. Any directions you guys could point me in or even any more question you think I should be thinking about that I havent mentioned would be very much appreciated.
p.s. I don't mind cleaning a non-chromed barrel, but would it be a bad idea to purchase an early matching sks russian laminate Izhevsk Arsenal over say a later model chromed barrel model considering the rough neighborhood I'll be using it in?
Well, I've used, almost to the point of abuse haha, the search function on the forum but there are always big gaps where I would like questions answered so at the risk of repeating previously posted questions that could not be unearthed, here goes...
I've recently decided that I'd like my first rifle to be:
-reasonably inexpensive initial purchase ($600 max)
-tough
-cheap to shoot
-not a 22lr (desire somewhat serious stopping power past the 150m mark)
-possibly semi-auto?
with the added interest of history and a story behind it.
I spend a lot of time in the bush and up until now have hunted with both traditional and compound bows, however there are some things a bow just cannot replace a good rifle in doing, anyways I digress...
When I started looking I had my heart set on a K98k, then various 8mm mauser variants m48/24/47 etc... this was partially due to me finding them to be a really attractive rifle and I loved the idea of having a 1000 yard rifle that could take a beating in the woods. then I discovered swedish mausers and really fell in love with the m38/96 and the 6.5x55 round, and was really disheartend to come to the conclusion that it would be a very pricey gun to shoot even after purchasing hand-loading equipment if I so chose in the future.
Enter the last phase I've been questioning, part of the purpose is reliable self-defense in the boreal of northern Canada (cougars scare me more then zombie apocalypses haha), should I be looking more seriously at semi-automatic rifles?
so I started looking at the m305b and the sks, obviously the sks fits the cheap bill, and it's tough, ammo is super easy to get but it's reliability as a large game hunting rifle out past 200 yards is easily questionable at best? The m305's accuracy at longer ranges has me interested and it is a nice rifle but I don't really trust the reliability portion as well as 7.62 nato being considerably more expensive then 7.63x39.
So as you can see, I've really only scratched the surface. Any directions you guys could point me in or even any more question you think I should be thinking about that I havent mentioned would be very much appreciated.
p.s. I don't mind cleaning a non-chromed barrel, but would it be a bad idea to purchase an early matching sks russian laminate Izhevsk Arsenal over say a later model chromed barrel model considering the rough neighborhood I'll be using it in?




















































