"Need" a 22-250

Tazzy

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
80   0   1
Location
Miramichi NB
I just laid some money down on a Remington VTR in 22-250 but I'm already having second thoughts after reading some reviews. What are your thoughts on this gun and what would you choose otherwise. Savage wasn't on the list at this store.
 
I looked at the weatherby and a Tikka T3 light also. I should have mentioned that I was looking for a walk around type of gun. The weatherby had a much longer barrel. They also had a T/C venture.....decisions decisions
 
The Weatherby Vanguard Varmint in 22-250 with the Schmidt & Bender a friend has that he let me shoot out of was pretty impressive. Very accurate! I wouldn't hesitate to buy one for bench shooting.

Myself I have a Tikka T3 Lite in .223 with a 4-12x Leupold and it's a great carry gun. Very accurate too!
 
I haven't heard good things about the VTR and that stupid triangular barrel, I would just go with an SPS light barrel, for a walk around 22-250. I have one in a 204, they're inexpensive and quite accurate and light.
 
I had a VTR in .308. After bedding it it was pretty accurate and more than competent as a hunting gun. I also bought a weatherby S2 vanguard. That gun was lighter, more accurate out of the box, and cheaper. Sold the VTR kept the S2.

IMHO the VTR's are a decent rifle but I think you can find better value for your money. The muzzle break and the triangle barrel add nothing to the gun other than looking different.
 
Bought a Vanguard S1 on sale almost a year ago and had a shoot off with a Tikka T3 same calibre (.243) and the vanguard spanked it. Every time, can easily do 1.5" at 200 yds.

Also got a chance to see/shoot one of those VTR with the stupid triangle barrel and it was horribly all over the place. Could have had better groups with a factory 10/22! This was in .308 but in it's defence it was brand new (using hand loads though).

I'm not a gun expert but I don't think the muzzle break does a damn thing. It doesn't reduce recoil at all and just shortens the barrel, maybe some weight reduction? As for the triangular barrel, all I can think of is weight reduction again. You're losing a lot of surface area for heat dissipation and that thing's gonna heat up quicker! I don't know, maybe I'm crazy.

EDIT: Forgot to mention the S1 has a Timney put in. Still cheaper than the other two though. I like that the VTR does feel sturdy though, when I hold a Tikka I feel like it's too light and sways more.
 
I have a VTR in .223. Great shooting gun........ .5 moa with win white box and my shakey hands! Fits me very nice! Compact and pretty sturdy. I really like it, kind of different looking with the barrel but it works for me!
 
I have a Tika T3 lite in 25/06 and love it. Light to carry and accurate. I also have a Stevens 200 22/250 and also find it accuarte and a good value if you don't want to spend a lot of coin. Only downside on it is it is a little heavy.
 
My options at the time earlier today were

T/C Vanguard
Weatherby
Tikka T3 lite
Remington VTR

I'll admit that I was drawn to the VTR by it's looks, but accuracy is the most important thing. I never really thought about the muzzle brake and how loud it would be.

It will be in 22-250. I'm curious if anybody has a T3 lite in this caliber and how does it shoot?
 
Last edited:
I run a BDL 22-250 and shoot a high volume of gophers every year with it.
Every Remington 700 I've shot has been very accurate.

I'm sure you'll be happy with it.
 
I haven't heard good things about the VTR and that stupid triangular barrel, I would just go with an SPS light barrel, for a walk around 22-250. I have one in a 204, they're inexpensive and quite accurate and light.
What he said! ....... There's not enough gophers and groundhogs here in NB to warrant a 22/250 heavy bbl and a 223 is a better round for range shooting. Most guys here use 22/250s for deer and/or coyote hunting, so again the HB is not needed.

Remington offers the 22/250 and 223 in SPS stainless. I'd look for one of those and update the stock down the road if needed.
 
I used to be a [Remington Man]. [REM 700'S].
I have owned at least 25 of them in a lot of different calibers.
Today I would never buy a new Remington.
They are overpriced and the quality is just not there.
My last new Remington was a model 700 VLS in 243 Caliber.
On it I had a Leupold 6.5x20 Varmint Target Dot scope. It was a tack driver.
Since then their quality control has gone down, The last 3 new Rem's I bought all had problems. [SHOTGUNS].
I would buy another Savage with accutrigger, [AWSOME]. And I won't break the bank.
I has just acquired a Weatherby Vanguard in 223. [SCOPED PACKAGE].
I just love it. It shoots good it feels good, and I like the 24" barrel.
If you have a problem with a Remington gun, they have a hard timer to respond to you, [THEY DON'T CARE].
SHOP AROUND BEFORE YOU PUT DOWN YOUR HARD EARNED CASH.
ASK YOUR DEALER IF HE WILL BACK YOU UP, IF YOU HAVE TROUBLE WITH THE FIREARM.
BEFORE YOUR PUT DOWN YOUR MONEY.

OLDTIMER LOU
 
What he said! ....... There's not enough gophers and groundhogs here in NB to warrant a 22/250 heavy bbl and a 223 is a better round for range shooting. Most guys here use 22/250s for deer and/or coyote hunting, so again the HB is not needed.

Remington offers the 22/250 and 223 in SPS stainless. I'd look for one of those and update the stock down the road if needed.

I don't know if I've ever seen a gopher here in NB. I already have a .222 and a .223 Heavy barrel so this gun is going to be my walking and throw it on the quad gun. I'm starting to favor the Tikka T3 light more. If needed I can also buy a McMillan stock for it down the road.

I like shooting centerfire .22's more than my bigger guns and so do my kids.
 
I don't know if I've ever seen a gopher here in NB.
Trust me, you haven't. :D

Go for a lightweight 22/250. You'll be happy with it. I had this one built with a 9" twist Shilen in MR contour and VXII 2x7.


010-3.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom