I wonder if refinishing a mkI or mkII (that needed some tlc from a smith anyway) would hurt the value of one in the Canadian market? Would parking one be a crime?
Unless the gun is pitted to hell and the finish is otherwise irreconcilable I would not bother, the MKs had utilitarian no nonsense trench warfare finishes that honestly did not look all that pretty when they were new. I think all the beauty marks they accumulated tell a story and contribute to the value of a true utilitarian firearm. Personally if I am going to refinish a gun I try to restore it to its original glory( so I would not park). But in the end its your gun do as you see fit.
While this is true, you can make almost any old gun look better by refinishing it. It really takes away from the value, oh no - we are in Canada where unlike he rest of the world it ads to it's valueapu that's one stunning looking gun.
.
..... As to being for "last resort short range contact presumably because your rifle was not available", I believe revolvers were only issued to officers, who wouldn't carry a rifle in any case. .....
.... and ....
Incidentally as a point of interest, handguns were not only issued to commissioned officers and NCOs, but also naval troops, airmen and soldiers who might have awkward/limited access to rifles such as machine gun crews, military police or tank crews.![]()
One point of correction - handguns were (and are) commonly carried by commissioned officers ..... but they were not issued to them (in either the British Army or Canadian Militia) until some time after WWI. Officers supplied all of their own uniforms and kit - including weapons - at personal expense.
Necro but thank you Apu for this thread and posting your data you collected from all your testing.



























