Buying new xcr need help with caliber.

God d... Ntn lol I am just afraid of the bullet blast right in my face. It seems so far back right on your cheek.

Ok go ahead and educate me why the tavor is better
 
Last edited:
I meant it as a positive for the XCR 7.62x39 calibre choice. BOOM is cool. pewpewpewpew is 22lr.., a different kind of cool. :cool:

I think there's an inherent therapeutic value associated with several thousand joules of energy blasting off from your fingertips. Maybe it could be best described as bonemarrow-vibratingly relaxing.
 
Get over it already, OP already made up his mind on a rifle do you really need to dog him around the forum?
I taught this was a free forum?

I also did not know that 2 post in 2 tread was dogging him arround... I would understand if youd be a xcr owner and I was trashing it relentlessly. But as I pointed out it is a nice rifle I was just pointing out other option as he said he was open to them.
 
I love my .308 xcr , ammo is a little pricey , but 400$ for a case of non corrosive 7.62x51 & you just can't beat the feeling of shooting a semi-auto .308 @ least in the great white north ! Lol
 
So your saying the 7.62 model can switch calibers? Ok apparently I didn't research sqwuat.

So if I buy 7.62 or 223 does it matter since calibers are easily changeable?

Yes you can, everthing can be swapped over in under a minute regardless of which model you start off with. In the kit you get a barrel, bolt, she'll deflector and one factory 5 round magazine. If you have a 7.62 kit there is no need to change the shell deflector when switching to .223, saves a little time there. That is the great thing about the XCR line of rifles. You can setup one rifle in any configuration you want as far as stocks, grips, optics and simply change the caliber you shoot and still maintain familiarity with the platform.
 
Last edited:
Well I am neutral on xcr vs tavor. I haven't shot eather. Some observations on both

The pros:

- xcr. Good ergos
. Take's ar mags
. Sturdy
. Fast mag change
. Caliber conversion

- tavor. Fairly good ergos
. Also take ar mags
. Military grade battle tested
. Compact


Cons

Xcr-. Consumer grade
. Previously ( I think) had some quality control issue
. On the heavier side of this category of rifle.
. Pricey caliber conversion

Tavor-. Slower mag change
. Not every body like the bullpup
. Supposedly bad trigger ( heavy)
 
If you think I should go with another one please tell me why.
because it sits in the safe untill you sell it because you take out the swiss and HK instead (my experience)

I wouldn't mind the XCR-M to try but I am pretty sure the RFB would remain my go to 308 gun and I would end up selling the XCR
 
Well I am neutral on xcr vs tavor. I haven't shot eather. Some observations on both

The pros:

- xcr. Good ergos
. Take's ar mags
. Sturdy
. Fast mag change
. Caliber conversion

- tavor. Fairly good ergos
. Also take ar mags
. Military grade battle tested
. Compact


Cons

Xcr-. Consumer grade
. Previously ( I think) had some quality control issue
. On the heavier side of this category of rifle.
. Pricey caliber conversion

Tavor-. Slower mag change
. Not every body like the bullpup
. Supposedly bad trigger ( heavy)
You haven't shot either?
 
I notice mfs makes cheap 223 ammo as well. It's like $360 for 1000 rounds. It's steel zinc coated. Is this corrosive? They also make a 7.62
 
if its corrosive it will say corrosive, mfs is generally non corrosive. surplus is corrosive. Have you considered a cz858? What's your budget? What would you like out of the rifle?

The cz is not the most refined rifle out there, but it will run, some have their issues known as the gremlin, look that up for furhter details, mine did not, cz vs csa has an opposite safety selector setup, something to keep in mind.

A lot of people swear by the xcr, I myself am not particularly fond of them, but I'm not interested in starting another pissing contest so I will leave it at that.

If you want top drawer, Swiss are heavy but very well built rifles.

You can look for a nr shrubmaster acr if you want but I'm not sure why you would take that over a swiss.

If you dont mind bullpup the tavor is a solid rifle.

If you want to keep it sub 2k for price there is the benelli mr1. I personally dont care for it. weird manual of arms, but it takes ar mags.

Out of the lot, I would take the cz. But then again I'm a function over form guy.
 
Last edited:
Well I am neutral on xcr vs tavor. I haven't shot eather. Some observations on both

The pros:

- xcr. Good ergos
. Take's ar mags
. Sturdy
. Fast mag change
. Caliber conversion

- tavor. Fairly good ergos
. Also take ar mags
. Military grade battle tested
. Compact


Cons

Xcr-. Consumer grade
. Previously ( I think) had some quality control issue
. On the heavier side of this category of rifle.
. Pricey caliber conversion

Tavor-. Slower mag change
. Not every body like the bullpup
. Supposedly bad trigger ( heavy)

Hmmm... scratches head and thinks: "if you haven't shot either, who's observations are you promoting???"
 
I bought my XCR in 6.8 SPC and loved it, so I went out and got the 5.56 conversion kit for it. Fun rifle to shoot, and legal to hunt deer with where you can use rifles.
 
I wouldn't say a swiss is heavy when compared to an XCR, it is also much better balanced making the extra weight less noticeable than an XCR (IMO)

You aren't talking to the biggest fan of the xcr, not much to convince me, I dont like them plain and simple. supernova can attest to that :)
 
Hmmm... scratches head and thinks: "if you haven't shot either, who's observations are you promoting???"

I am giving my opinion, at least I say I haven't shot them unlike some that bash a rifle and never said they haven't even seen the rifle...
 
Back
Top Bottom