im reading quite a few "legality" comments on this thread and i suppose reclassification of bullpups is always a nightmarish possibility, but I say we stand proud. safety in numbers? hells yes.
as for the T97 being fugly? hells yes to that too.
that being said i have a number of norcs that work fine, and i dont usually buy guns based on looks or lack thereof- more on proven platform and reliability. T97 is unproven.
personally, I have opted save for 3X longer (3X the price) for the Tavor (probably 3X the gun), which is a ###y lookin beast and, although still a newer BP itself, has proven itself loads more than the T97. captain obvious
there is a niche for bullpups here in Canada cuz their barrel length relative to their overall length makes them a weildy non-res option in the bush. captain obvious again.
the more zany gun laws the gov imposes, the more short, non-res options like bullpups will take off IMHO.
I'm hopin the T97's make their owners happy, I just don't think it's the BP for me.
i am mostly a pistol shooter, so i am no bullpup expert. I'm just getting into the platform, so this is just my 2 cents.
kudos to all Canadians arming themselves legally.
yee haw
P.S. I'm pretty sure that no matter what i post, someone will try and take me down a peg or point out a mistake, so just try and remember that not everyone is as awesome as you
