I think there is an inherent flaw in shooting 45 colt shells in a 450 - 577 barrel --- the groove diameter of the barrel is up around 460 and I think the bore is .450 while the colt slug is only .451. You might want to try using hollow based soft 455 Webley slugs in your 45 colt shells, in the hope that they will obturate and fit the rifling. The pistol shells do have the advantage that the liner is thick enough that it does not expand when they are fired. I had problems shooting 45-70 loads in an adaptor because the end of the shell is in the thin neck portion of the adaptor and if the neck portion is not a tight fit to that specific chamber, you get a pressure ridge or expanded area that makes the fired shells hard to remove
cheers mooncoon
I await a report on results!
It would be interesting to run a 31/64" chucking reamer into the adapter to extend the "chamber" to allow the use of 460 S&W brass. Then load as "fat" a bullet as the adapter will allow, made hollow-based and/or with soft lead, as already mentionned. Strictly a handloading proposition of course.
It would be interesting to run a 31/64" chucking reamer into the adapter to extend the "chamber" .
th adaptor I have has had a .410 reamer run though it .468" right though ive been looking at .460 S&W brass my idea is to get a heel based bullet made that's .468" and a .454" heel make a .470 black powder magnum
I am not sure what a chucking reamer is, but if is one intended to be used in a metal lathe and on the basis that implies that you have access to a metal lathe, why not just make a spade or D bit reamer and dimension it to whatever cartridge or chamber that you want?
cheers mooncoon
If you want to use 460 S&W brass, you're going to need the adapter opened up to 0.478" plus clearance. 31/64" = 0.484375" - just about perfect if you use a heeled bullet. You could leave the area where the bullet is outside of the case at 0.468". My biggest concern here is the resulting thinness of the adapter
it will chamber both .45 colt and .410 shotshells it should fit the .460 S&W as near the mouth is where its .468
.468"-.470" not .460 that's way too small
I finally got around to miking some Kynock shells that I am guessing were made around 1950 - 60 maybe a bit later. They are paper patched and loaded with smokeless. The core diameter appears to be roughly .451 - 2 and the outside of the paper mikes .472 - .475. The paper is slightly out of round after all of these years and there is a slight variation from shell to shell. I doubt that would make any difference when shot. I am surprised at how thick the paper jacket is; in the past when I have made up PP bullets for various guns, I used .004" thick paper and when dry sized them to about 1/2 that thickness. For example 2 wraps of paper on a .450 core and sized to .458 would leave the paper about .004" thick for the two wraps.
cheers mooncoon
yes its thick paper I forget what the min bore diameter is but I do know the early patern guns are .465 at the muzzle and even bigger at the start of the 8" long throat a .465 to .468 bullet is the best bet for the mk1 mk2 and mk3 pattern guns mk4's tend to like a .468" to .470" bullet ive used but don't recommend a lee .476" 400gr cast in soft lead in my mk4. also ive never heard anyone sizing paper patch bullets most just roll them and let them dry
I have tried that bullet (the Lee 90241) in both my Martini-Henry and my Belgian Albini.
![]()
Mine mold drops bullets at 0.473" and 388 grs and I size them to 0.468" using a custom sizer. Works ok for me.
The problem with sizing down much more than 0.005" is that you lose too much lube capacity, and the profile of the bullet can change enough that it has to be seated deeply missing crimp grooves and reducing powder capacity. These old guns have huge case capacity and tend to have very long throats, so that's rarely an issue with them though.
Out of curiosity, why not just shoot 455/570 in your martinis? Just sayin'....